Abstract
Hemodialysis adequacy is a complex concept that encompasses largely the dialysis dose appraisal based on monthly blood-based urea Kt/V measurement. Renal replacement therapies should provide an efficient way to clear adequately larger molecular weight solutes, to restore normal salt, electrolytes and fluid balance, to correct salt-dependent hypertension, to improve hemodynamic stability and to reduce bio-incompatibility of the hemodialysis system. Targeting such ambitious objective is obviously under the clinical supervision and judgment of nephrologists and care givers. Monitoring and achievement of these targets as a part of a continuous quality improvement process is necessary to attain dialysis adequacy goals. This review aims to provide an overview of available online hemodialysis technologies, their current applications in clinic, and the potential for future developments in improving care of chronic kidney disease patients. In order to facilitate understanding of readers we choose to classify online monitoring devices based on their clinical action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azar, A.T.: Biofeedback systems and adaptive control hemodialysis treatment. Saudi. J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 19(6), 895–903 (2008)
Akl, A.I., Sobh, M.A., Enab, Y.M., Tattersall, J.: Artificial intelligence: a new approach for prescription and monitoring of hemodialysis therapy. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 38(6), 1277–1283 (2001)
Al Saran, K., Sabry, A., Abdulghafour, M., Yehia, A.: Online conductiv-ity montoring of dialysis adequacy versus Kt/V derived from urea reduction ratio: a prospective study from a Saudi Center. Ren. Fail. 32(1), 36–40 (2010)
Andrulli, S., Colzani, S., Mascia, F., et al.: The role of blood volume reduction in the genesis of intradialytic hypotension. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 40(6), 1244–1254 (2002)
Argilés, A., Ficheux, A., Thomas, M., et al.: Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement. Kidney Int. 52(2), 530–537 (1997)
Barth, R.H.: Dialysis by the numbers: the false promise of Kt/V. Semin. Dial. 2(4), 207–212 (1989)
Barth, C., Boer, W., Garzoni, D., et al.: Characteristics of hypotension-prone haemodialysis patients: is there a critical relative blood volume? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18(7), 1353–1360 (2003)
Basile, C., Giordano, R., Vernaglione, L., et al.: Efficacy and safety of haemodialysis treatment with the Hemocontrol biofeedback system: a prospective mediumterm study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16(2), 328–334 (2001a)
Basile, C., Giordano, R., Montanaro, A.: How large is the variability of relative blood volume during haemodialysis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16(2), 431–432 (2001b)
Bos, W.J., Bruin, S., van Olden, R.W., et al.: Cardiac and hemodynamic effects of hemodialysis and ultrafiltration. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 35(5), 819–826 (2000)
Bonforte, G., Dozio, B., Scanziani, R., et al.: Continuous on-line deter-mination of recirculation by thermodilution in hemodialysis patients. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 18(9), 526–529 (1995)
Bosc, J.Y., LeBlanc, M., Garred, L.J., et al.: determination of blood recirculation rate in hemodialysis by a conductivity method. ASAIO J. 44(1), 68–73 (1998)
Brimble, K.S., Onge, J.S., Treleaven, D.J., Carlisle, E.J.: Comparison of volume of blood processed on haemodialysis adequacy measurement sessions vs regular non-adequacy sessions. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 17(8), 1470–1474 (2002)
Calzavara, P., Calconi, G., Da Rin, G., et al.: A new biosensor for continuous monitoring of the spent dialysate urea level in standard hemodialsis. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 21(3), 147–150 (1998)
Canaud, B.: Adequacy target in hemodialysis. J. Nephrol. 17(Suppl. 8), S77–S86 (2004)
Canaud, B., Bosc, J.Y., Cabrol, L., et al.: Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring. Kidney Int. 76, S28–S40 (2000)
Canaud, B., Bosc, J.Y., Leblanc, M., et al.: Evaluation of high-fluxhemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 31(1), 74–80 (1998a)
Canaud, B., Bosc, J.Y., Leblanc, M., et al.: On-line dialysis quantification in acutely ill patients: preliminary clinical experience with a multipurpose urea sensor monitoring device. ASAIO J. 44(3), 184–190 (1998b)
Canaud, B., Bosc, J.Y., Leblanc, M., et al.: A simple and accurate method todetermine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration. Kidney Int. 51(6), 2000–2005 (1997)
Chesterton, L., Lambie, S.H., Hulme, L.J., et al.: Online measurement of haemoglobin concentration. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 20(9), 1951–1955 (2005)
Covic, A., Goldsmith, D.J., Hill, K., et al.: Urea kinetic modeling: are any of the ’bedside’ Kt/V formulae reliable enough? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 13(12), 3138–3146 (1998)
Daugirdas, J.T.: Dialysis hypotension: a hemodynamic analysis. Kidney Int. 39(2), 233–246 (1991)
Daugirdas, J.T., Schneditz, D.: Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J. 41(3), M719–M724 (1995)
Davenport, A.: Can advances in hemodialysis machine technology prevent intradialytic hypotension? Semin. Dial. 22(3), 231–236 (2009)
Depner, T.A., Daugirdas, J.T.: Equations for normalized protein catabolic rate based on two-point modeling of hemodialysis urea kinetics. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7(5), 780–785 (1996)
Del Vecchio, L., Di Filippo, S., Andrulli, S., et al.: Conductivity: on-line monitoring of dialysis adequacy. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 21(9), 521–525 (1998)
Depner, T.A., Keshaviah, P.R., Ebben, J.P., et al.: Multicenter clinical va-lidation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J. Am. Soc.-Nephrol. 7(3), 464–471 (1996)
Desai, A.A., Bolus, R., Nissenson, A., et al.: Identifying best practices in dialysis care: results of cognitive interviews and a national survey of dialysis providers. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3(4), 1066–1076 (2008)
Di Filippo, S., Andrulli, S., Manzoni, C., et al.: On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int. 54(1), 263–267 (1998)
Di Filippo, S., Pozzoni, P., Manzoni, C., et al.: Relationship between urea clearance and ionic dialysance determined using a single-step conductivity profile. Kidney Int. 68(5), 2389–2395 (2005)
Dossabhoy, N.R., Ram, S.J., Nassar, R., et al.: Stenosis surveillance of hemodialysis grafts by duplex ultrasound reduces hospitalizations and cost of care. Semin. Dial. 18(6), 550–557 (2005)
Dominic, S.C., Ramachandran, S., Somiah, S., et al.: Quenching the thirst in dialysis patients. Nephron 73(4), 597–600 (1996)
Eknoyan, G., Beck, G.J., Cheung, A.K., et al.: Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(25), 2010–2019 (2002)
Fridolin, I., Magnusson, M., Lindberg, L.G.: On-line monitoring of solutes in dialysate using absorption of ultraviolet radiation: technique description. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 25(8), 748–761 (2002)
Garred, L.J., Canaud, B., Argiles, A., et al.: Protein catabolic rate determi-nation from a single measurement of dialyzed urea. ASAIO J. 41(3), M804–M809 (1995)
Garred, L.J.: Dialysate-based kinetic modeling. Adv. Ren. Replace Ther. 2(4), 305–318 (1995)
Garred, L.J., Rittau, M., McCready, W., Canaud, B.: Urea kinetic model-ling by partial dialysate collection. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 12(2), 96–102 (1989)
Gabrielli, D., Krystal, B., Katzarski, K., et al.: Improved intradialytic sta-bility during haemodialysis with blood volume-controlled ultrafil-tration. J. Nephrol. 22(2), 232–240 (2009)
Goldau, R., Kuhlmann, U., Samadi, N., et al.: Ionic dialysance measure-ment is urea distribution volume dependent: a new approach to better results. Artif. Organs. 26(4), 321–332 (2002)
Gotch, F.A., Sargent, J.A.: A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 28(3), 526–534 (1985)
Greene, T., Daugirdas, J., Depner, T., et al.: Hemodialysis Study Group. Association of achieved dialysis dose with mortality in the hemo-dialysis study: an example of "dose-targeting bias”. J. Am. Soc.-Nephrol. 16(11), 3371–3380 (2005)
Gross, M., Maierhofer, A., Tetta, C., et al.: Online clearance measure-ment in high-efficiency hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int. 72(12), 1550–1553 (2007)
Hakim, R.M., Depner, T.A., Parker, T.F.: Adequacy of hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 20(2), 107–123 (1992)
Hartvigsen, G., Johansen, M.A., Hasvold, P., et al.: Challenges in tele-medicine and eHealth: lessons learned from 20 years with tele-medicine in Tromso. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 129(pt. 1), 82–86 (2007)
Hernandez-Herrera, G., Martin-Malo, A., Rodriguez, M., Aljama, P.: Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring. Nephron 89(1), 37–42 (2001)
Horácek, J., Sulková, S.D., Fortová, M., et al.: Resting energy expendi-ture and thermal balance during isothermic and thermoneutral-haemodialysis: heat production does not explain increased body temperature during haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22(12), 3553–3560 (2007)
Jurkiewicz, M., Solé, S., Almirall, J., et al.: Validation of an automatic urea analyser used in the continuous monitoring of hemodialysis parameters. Analyst 121(7), 959–963 (1996)
Johner, C., Chamney, P.W., Schneditz, D., Krämer, M.: Evaluation of an ultrasonic blood volume monitor. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 13(8), 2098–2103 (1998)
Katopodis, K.P., Hoenich, N.A.: Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance. Clinical Nephrology 57(3), 215–220 (2002)
Krepel, H.P., Nette, R.W., Akçahüseyin, E., et al.: Variability of relative blood volume during haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 15(5), 673–679 (2000)
Kloppenburg, W.D., Stegeman, C.A., Hooyschuur, M., et al.: Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient. Kidney Int. 55(5), 1961–1969 (1999)
Krivitski, N., Schneditz, D.: Arteriovenous vascular access flow meas-urement: accuracy and clinical implications. Contrib. Nephrol. 142, 269–284 (2004)
Krivitski, N.M.: Novel method to measure access flow during hemo-dialysis by ultrasound velocity dilution technique. ASAIO J. 41(3), M741–M745 (1995)
Kuhn, C., Saile, P., Osten, B., et al.: The blood temperature monitor of the new 5008 dialysis machine overestimates vascular access re-circulation. JASN Abstracts (F-PO1048) (2006)
Lameire, N., Van Biesen, W., Vanholder, R.: Did 20 years of techno-logical innovations in hemodialysis contribute to better patient out-comes? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4(Suppl. 1), S30–S40 (2009)
Lee, W.C., Tsai, C.J., Huang, C.C., et al.: Assessment of dialysis adequacy using the dialysate urea monitor: preliminary experience of the dialysate urea monitor. Ren. Fail. 19(6), 789–797 (1997)
Lim, P.S., Lee, H.P., Kho, B., et al.: Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor. Blood Purif. 17(4), 199–205 (1999)
Lindsay, R.M., Huang, S.H., Sternby, J., Hertz, T.: The measurement of hemodialysis access blood flow by a conductivity step method. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5(9), 1602–1606 (2010)
Lindsay, R.M., Sternby, J., Olde, B., et al.: Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clear-ance. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1(5), 960–964 (2006)
Leypoldt, J.K., Cheung, A.K., Steuer, R.R., et al.: Determination of circu-lating blood volume by continuously monitoring hematocrit during hemodialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6(2), 214–219 (1995)
Locatelli, F., Di Filippo, S., Manzoni, C., et al.: Monitoring sodium re-moval and delivered dialysis by conductivity. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 18(11), 716–721 (1995)
Locatelli, F.: Dose of dialysis, convection and haemodialysis patients outcome: what the HEMO study doesn’t tell us: the European viewpoint. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18(6), 1061–1065 (2003)
Locatelli, F., Buoncristiani, U., Canaud, B., et al.: Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 20(1), 22–33 (2005)
Luman, M., Jerotskaja, J., Lauri, K., Fridolin, I.: Dialysis dose and nutri-tion assessment by optical on-line dialysis adequacy monitor. Clin. Nephrol. 72(4), 303–311 (2009)
Mancini, E., Mambelli, E., Irpinia, M., et al.: Prevention of dialysis hy-potension episodes using fuzzy logic control system. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22(5), 1420–1427 (2007)
Mambelli, E., Mancini, E., Santoro, A.: A continuous and non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring system in dialysis patients. Nephron Clin. Pract. 107(4), C170–C176 (2007)
Maggiore, Q., Pizzarelli, F., Santoro, A., et al.: Study Group of Thermal Balance and Vascular Stability. The effects of control of thermal balance on vascular stability in hemodialysis patients: results of the European randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 40(2), 280–290 (2002)
Marcelli, D., Moscardó, V., Steil, H., et al.: Data management and quality assurance for dialysis network. Contrib. Nephrol. 137, 293–299 (2002)
McIntyre, C.W., Lambie, S.H., Taal, M.W., Fluck, R.J.: Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered dose. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18(3), 559–562 (2003a)
McIntyre, C.W., Lambie, S.H., Fluck, R.J.: Biofeedback controlled haemodialysis (BF-HD) reduces symptoms and increases both haemodynamic tolerability and dialysis adequacy in non-hypotension prone stable patients. Clin. Nephrol. 60(2), 105–112 (2003b)
McMahon, M.P., Campbell, S.B., Shannon, G.F., et al.: A non-invasive continuous method of measuring blood volume during haemodi-alysis using optical techniques. Med. Eng. Phys. 18(2), 105–109 (1996)
Mercadal, L., Servais, A., Venditto, M., et al.: Measuring plasma conduc-tivity to detect sodium load in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3(3), 743–746 (2008)
Mercadal, L., Challier, E., Cluzel, P., et al.: Detection of vascular access stenosis by measurement of access blood flow from ionic dialy-sance. Blood Purif. 20(2), 177–181 (2002)
Mercadal, L., Petitclerc, T., Jaudon, M.C., et al.: Is ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency? Artif. Organs. 22(12), 1005–1009 (1998)
Micromedia: Biosensor for on-line dialysis efficiency monitoring. EU Ga-teway Program, http://www.hemodia.com/images/posterEU-Gateway.pdf
Mitra, S., Chamney, P., Greenwood, R., Farrington, K.: Linear decay of relative blood volume during ultrafiltration predicts hemodynamic instability. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 40(3), 556–565 (2002)
Moret, K., Hassell, D., Kooman, J.P., et al.: Ionic mass balance and blood volume preservation during a high, standard, and individualized dialysate sodium concentration. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 17(8), 1463–1469 (2002)
Montagnac, R., Vitry, F., Rehn, Y., et al.: HemoCue: preliminary considerations about its use in hemodialysis. Nephrol. Ther. 3(2), 60–64 (2007)
Navino, C., Tetta, C., Tessore, V., Verzetti, G.: Assessment of efficiency using on-line urea kinetic modeling in hemodiafiltration. ASAIO J. 44(5), M565–M568 (1998)
NKF-K/DOQI, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Ade quacy: update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 37(Suppl. 1), S7–S64 (2001)
Paolini, F., Mancini, E., Bosetto, A., Santoro, A.: Hemoscan: a dialysis machine integrated blood volume monitor. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 18(9), 487–494 (1995)
Pedrini, L.A., De Cristofaro, V.: On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal. Kidney Int. 64(4), 1505–1513 (2003)
Pedrini, L.A., Cozzi, G., Faranna, P., et al.: Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. Kidney Int. 69(3), 573–579 (2006)
Pérgola, P.E., Habiba, N.M., Johnson, J.M.: Body temperature regulation during hemodialysis in long-term patients: is it time to change di-alysate temperature prescription? Am. J. Kidney Dis. 44(1), 155–165 (2004)
Racki, S., Zaputović, L., Maleta, I., et al.: Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal. Ren. Fail. 27(5), 601–604 (2005)
Ridel, C., Osman, D., Mercadal, L., et al.: Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure? Intensive Care Med. 33(3), 460–465 (2007)
Ronco, C., Brendolan, A., Milan, M., et al.: Impact of biofeedback-induced cardiovascular stability on haemodialysis tolerance and ef-ficiency. Kidney Int. 58(2), 800–808 (2000)
Ronco, C., Bellomo, R.: Central circulation, peripheral circulation and recirculation. Blood Purif. 15(4-6), 334–335 (1997)
Rodriguez, H.J., Domenici, R., Diroll, A., Goykhman, I.: Assessment of dry weight by monitoring changes in blood volume during hemo-dialysis using Crit-Line. Kidney Int. 68(2), 854–861 (2005)
Rumpsfeld, M., Arild, E., Norum, J., Breivik, E.: Telemedicine in haemo-dialysis: a university department and two remote satellites linked together as one common workplace. J. Telemed. Tele-care 11(5), 251–255 (2005)
Santoro, A., Mancini, E., Basile, C., et al.: Blood volume controlled hemodialysis in hypotension-prone patients: a randomized, multicenter controlled trial. Kidney Int. 62(3), 1034–1045 (2002)
Santoro, A., Mancini, E., Canova, C., Mambelli, E.: Thermal balance in convective therapies. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18(Suppl 7), vii41–vii45 (2003)
Santoro, A., Mancini, E., Paolini, F., et al.: Blood volume regulation during hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 32(5), 739–748 (1998)
Sands, J., Glidden, D., Miranda, C.: Access flow measured during he-modialysis. ASAIO J. 42(5), M530–M532 (1996)
Schmidt, R., Roeher, O., Hickstein, H., Korth, S.: Prevention of haemodi-alysis-induced hypotension by biofeedback control of ultrafiltration and infusion. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16(3), 595–603 (2001)
Sehgal, A.R., Leon, J.B., Siminoff, L.A., et al.: Improving the quality of hemodialysis treatment: a community-based randomized con-trolled trial to overcome patient-specific barriers. JAMA 287(15), 1961–1967 (2002)
Schneditz, D., Ronco, C., Levin, N.: Temperature control by the blood temperature monitor. Semin. Dial. 16(6), 477–482 (2003)
Schneditz, D., Wang, E., Levin, N.W.: Validation of haemodialysis re-circulation and access blood flow measured by thermodilution. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 14(2), 376–383 (1999)
Shoji, T., Tsubakihara, Y., Fujii, M., Imai, E.: Hemodialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 66(3), 1212–1220 (2004)
Spiegel, B., Bolus, R., Desai, A.A., et al.: Dialysis Practices That Distinguish Facilities with Below- versus Above-Expected Mortality. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5(11), 2024–2033 (2010)
Stoffel, M.P., Barth, C., Lauterbach, K.W., Baldamus, C.A.: Evidence-based medical quality management in dialysis: Improvement of hemodialysis adequacy. Clin. Nephrol. 62(3), 219–225 (2004)
Tattersall, J., Martin-Malo, A., Pedrini, L., et al.: EBPG guideline on di-alysis strategies. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22(Suppl. 2), ii5–ii21 (2007)
Tislér, A., Akócsi, K., Borbás, B., et al.: The effect of frequent or occa-sional dialysis-associated hypotension on survival of patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 18(12), 2601–2605 (2003)
Tonelli, M., Astephen, P., Andreou, P., et al.: Blood volume monitoring in intermittent hemodialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 62(3), 1075–1080 (2002)
Tordoir, J., Canaud, B., Haage, P., et al.: EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22(Suppl. 2), ii88–ii117 (2007)
Uhlin, F., Fridolin, I., Lindberg, L.G., Magnusson, M.: Estimation of delivered dialysis dose by on-line monitoring of the ultraviolet absorbance in the spent dialysate. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 41(5), 1026–1036 (2003)
Válek, M., Lopot, F., Polakovic, V.: Arteriovenous fistula, blood flow, cardiac output, and left ventricle load in hemodialysis patients. ASAIO J. 56(3), 200–203 (2010)
Vaussenat, F., Canaud, B., Bosc, J.Y., et al.: Intradialytic glucose infusion increases polysulphone membrane permeability and post-dilutionalhaemodiafiltration performances. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 15(4), 511–516 (2000)
Vaussenat, F., Bosc, J.Y., LeBlanc, M., Canaud, B.: Data acquisition sy-tem for dialysis machines. A model for membrane hydraulic permeability. ASAIO J. 43(6), 910–915 (1997)
Waniewski, J.: Mathematical modeling of fluid and solute transport in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Journal of Membrane Science 274(1-2), 24–37 (2006)
Wang, E., Schneditz, D., Kaufman, A.M., Levin, N.W.: Sensitivity and specificity of the thermodilution technique in detection of access recirculation. Nephron 85(2), 134–141 (2000)
Woods, H.F.: Variability of relative blood volume during haemodialysis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16(2), 430–431 (2001)
Wolkotte, C., Hassell, D.R., Moret, K., et al.: Blood volume control by biofeedback and dialysis-induced symptomatology. A short-term clinical study. Nephron 92(3), 605–609 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Canaud, B., Granger, A., Chenine-Khoualef, L., Patrier, L., Morena, M., Leray-Moragués, H. (2013). On-Line Hemodialysis Monitoring: New Tools for Improving Safety, Tolerance and Efficacy. In: Azar, A. (eds) Modeling and Control of Dialysis Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 405. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27558-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27558-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27557-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27558-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)