Abstract
We investigate the descriptional complexity and decidability of obliviousness for two-way finite automata. In particular, we consider the simulation of two-way deterministic finite automata (\(\textrm{2DFA}\)s) by oblivious \(\textrm{2DFA}\)s, the simulation of oblivious \(\textrm{2DFA}\)s by sweeping \(\textrm{2DFA}\)s and one-way nondeterministic finite automata (\(\textrm{1NFA}\)s) as well as the simulation of sweeping \(\textrm{2DFA}\)s by \(\textrm{1NFA}\)s. In all cases exponential upper and lower bounds on the number of states are obtained for languages over an alphabet with at most four latters. Moreover, it is shown that obliviousness is decidable for \(\textrm{2DFA}\)s.
Supported by CRUI/DAAD under the project “Programma Vigoni: Descriptional Complexity of Non-Classical Computational Models.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berman, P., Lingas, A.: On the complexity of regular languages in terms of finite automata. Tech. Rep. 304, Polish Academy of Sciences (1977)
Birget, J.C.: Intersection and union of regular languages and state complexity. Inform. Process. Lett. 43, 185–190 (1992)
Chrobak, M.: Finite automata and unary languages. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 47, 149–158 (1986)
Geffert, V.: Nondeterministic computations in sublogarithmic space and space constructibility. SIAM J. Comput. 20, 484–498 (1991)
Geffert, V., Mereghetti, C., Pighizzini, G.: Converting Two-Way Nondeterministic Unary Automata into Simpler Automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 295, 189–203 (2003)
Geffert, V., Pighizzini, G.: Two-way unary automata versus logarithmic space. Inform. Comput. 209, 1016–1025 (2011)
Glaister, I., Shallit, J.: A lower bound technique for the size of nondeterministic finite automata. Inform. Process. Lett. 59, 75–77 (1996)
Gurari, E.M.: The equivalence problem for deterministic two-way sequential transducers is decidable. SIAM J. Comput. 11, 448–452 (1982)
Holzer, M.: Multi-head finite automata: data-independent versus data-dependent computations. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 286, 97–116 (2002)
Holzer, M., Kutrib, M.: Descriptional complexity – An introductory survey. In: Scientific Applications of Language Methods, pp. 1–58. Imperial College Press (2010)
Holzer, M., Kutrib, M., Malcher, A.: Multi-head finite automata: Origins and directions. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 412, 83–96 (2011)
Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979)
Hromkovič, J., Schnitger, G.: Nondeterminism versus Determinism for Two-way Finite Automata: Generalizations of Sipser’s Separation. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 439–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Hromkovič, J., Schnitger, G.: Lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. Autom., Lang. Comb. 14, 23–31 (2009)
Kapoutsis, C.A.: Removing Bidirectionality from Nondeterministic Finite Automata. In: Jedrzejowicz, J., Szepietowski, A. (eds.) MFCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3618, pp. 544–555. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Kapoutsis, C.A.: Two-Way Automata versus Logarithmic Space. In: Kulikov, A., Vereshchagin, N. (eds.) CSR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6651, pp. 359–372. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Lange, K.J., Niedermeier, R.: Data-Independences of Parallel Random Access Machines. In: Shyamasundar, R.K. (ed.) FSTTCS 1993. LNCS, vol. 761, pp. 104–113. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Leung, H.: Tight lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. Comput. System Sci. 63, 384–393 (2001)
Leung, H.: A technique for proving lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. Autom., Lang. Comb. 14, 93–105 (2009)
Lupanov, O.B.: A comparison of two types of finite sources. Problemy Kybernetiki 9, 321–326 (1963) (in Russian); German translation: Über den Vergleich zweier Typen endlicher Quellen. Probleme der Kybernetik 6, 328–335 (1966)
Mereghetti, C., Pighizzini, G.: Optimal simulations between unary automata. SIAM J. Comput. 30, 1976–1992 (2001)
Meyer, A.R., Fischer, M.J.: Economy of description by automata, grammars, and formal systems. In: Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory (SWAT 1971), pp. 188–191. IEEE (1971)
Micali, S.: Two-way deterministic finite automata are exponentially more succinct than sweeping automata. Inform. Process. Lett. 12, 103–105 (1981)
Moore, F.R.: On the bounds for state-set size in the proofs of equivalence between deterministic, nondeterministic, and two-way finite automata. IEEE Trans. Comput. 20, 1211–1214 (1971)
Paterson, M.S., Fischer, M.J., Meyer, A.R.: An improved overlap argument for on-line multiplication. In: Complexity of Computation. SIAM-AMS Proceedings, vol. 7, pp. 97–112. AMS, New Jersey (1974)
Petersen, H.: The Head Hierarchy for Oblivious Finite Automata with Polynomial Advice Collapses. In: Brim, L., Gruska, J., Zlatuška, J. (eds.) MFCS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1450, pp. 296–304. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Rabin, M.O., Scott, D.: Finite automata and their decision problems. IBM J. Res. Dev. 3, 114–125 (1959)
Sakoda, W.J., Sipser, M.: Nondeterminism and the size of two way finite automata. In: Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1978), pp. 275–286. ACM Press, New York (1978)
Sipser, M.: Lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. Comput. System Sci. 21, 195–202 (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kutrib, M., Malcher, A., Pighizzini, G. (2012). Oblivious Two-Way Finite Automata: Decidability and Complexity. In: Fernández-Baca, D. (eds) LATIN 2012: Theoretical Informatics. LATIN 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29344-3_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29344-3_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29343-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29344-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)