Abstract
The helpfulness rating of Amazon product review, a popular vote feature used by Amazon to rank product reviews and display them to online shoppers, has important implications for online shopping decisions. This research investigates how objective those helpfulness ratings are. The general assumption is that the ratings are "representative" views of the shoppers. However, previous studies on product reviews indicate bias may also exist among helpfulness ratings. Using the survey questionnaire, the study found that there were indeed significant differences between the helpfulness ratings displayed at Amazon.com and those from a simulated online shopper population. The survey results also show that there are evidences of rating differences by gender, age, ethnicity, income and mobile device use for shopping. Thus the "true" ratings on online user reviews may well be quite different from what we see at Amazon.com. Implications and limitations of this research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wan, Y., Menon, S., Ramaprasad, A.: A Classification of Product Comparison Agents. Communications of the ACM 50, 65–71 (2007)
Chen, Y., Xie, J.: Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix. Management Science 54, 477–491 (2008)
Maes, P.: Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37, 30–40 (1994)
Senecal, S., Nantel, J.: The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing 80, 159–169 (2004)
Mackiewicz, J.: Reviewer bias and credibility in online reviews. In: 72nd Annual Convention of the Association for Business Communication, Washington, D.C. (2007)
Dellarocas, C.: Online reputation systems: how to design one that does what you need. MIT Sloan Management Review 51, 33–38 (2010)
Brian Arthur, W., Ermoliev, Y.M., Kaniovski, Y.M.: Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. European Journal of Operational Research 30, 294–303 (1987)
Kapoor, G., Piramuthu, S.: Sequential bias in online product reviews. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 19, 85–95 (2009)
Salganik, M.J., Dodds, P.S., Watts, D.J.: Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science 311, 3 (2006)
Li, X., Hitt, L.M.: Self-Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews. Information Systems Research 19, 456–474 (2008)
Wang, C., Zhang, X., Hann, I.-H.: Social bias in online product ratings: a quasi-experimental analysis. In: WISE 2010, St. Louis, MO (2010)
Jurca, R., Garcin, F., Talwar, A., Faltings, B.: Reporting incentives and biases in online review forums. ACM Transactions on the Web 4, 1–27 (2010)
Hu, N., Zhang, J., Pavlou, P.A.: Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews. Communications of the ACM 52, 144–147 (2009)
Nelson, P.: Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78, 311–329 (1970)
Darby, M.R., Kami, E.: Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16, 66–86 (1973)
Nelson, P.: Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy 82, 729–754 (1974)
Gravetter, F.J., Wallnau, L.B.: Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Wadsworth, Belmont (2009)
Mudambi, S.M., Schuff, D.: What makes a helpful online review? a study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly 34, 185–200 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wan, Y., Nakayama, M. (2012). Are Amazon.com Online Review Helpfulness Ratings Biased or Not?. In: Shaw, M.J., Zhang, D., Yue, W.T. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29872-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29873-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)