Skip to main content

Understanding User’s Acceptance of Social Shopping Websites: Effects of Social Comparison and Trust

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 102))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social shopping websites are among the latest developments in E-commerce to combine the power of social networking with Internet shopping to provide a unique online experience. While the adoption of information technology is well studied, new theoretical development is needed to account for the specific characteristics of social shopping websites. This study augments the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) with social factors including an online shopper’s tendency to social comparison, and trust in information privacy and data security. Results provide significant support of the extended model. Directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vascellaro, J.E., et al.: The Year Ahead for Media: Digital or Die. Wall Street Journal, B1 (January 4, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Needleman, S.E.: Merchants Push Sales Through Social Media - Early Adopters Add Shopping-Cart Apps to Fan Pages to Sell Items. Wall Street Journal, B6 (June 1, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mao, E., Palvia, P.: Testing an Extended Model of IT Acceptance in the Chinese Cultural Context. ACM SIGMIS Database 37(2-3), 20–32 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7, 117–140 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buunk, A.P., Gibbons, F.X.: Social Comparison: The End of a Theory and the Emergence of a Field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(1), 3–21 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu, C.-L., Lu, H.-P.: Why Do People Play On-line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience. Information & Management 41(7), 853–868 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palvia, P.: The Role of Trust in E-commerce Relational Exchange: A Unified Model. Information & Management 46, 213–220 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chellappa, R.K., Sin, R.G.: Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma. Information Technology and Management 6(2-3), 181–202 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, M.-C.: Predicting and Explaining the Adoption of Online Trading: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. Decision Support Systems 47(2), 133–142 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L., Sherrell, D.L.: Consumer Acceptance of Virtual Stores: A Theoretical Model and Critical Success Factors For Virtual Stores. Databse for Advances in Information Systems 35(2), 8–31 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, N., Benbasat, I.: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites. Information Systems Research 17(4), 425–439 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman, H.H., Fireworker, R.B.: The Susceptibility of Consumers to Unseen Group Influence. Journal of Social Psychology 102(1), 155–156 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gefen, D.: What Makes an ERP Implementation Relationship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 263–288 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kasteler, J.: Why You Should Get Involved With Social Shopping: E-comerce 2.0. Online Report (2009), http://searchengineland.com/

  16. Gibbons, F.X., Buunk, B.P.: Individual Differences in Social Comparison: Development of a Scale of Social Comparison Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(1), 129–142 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A.: SmartPLS 2005. University of Hamburg Hamburg, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P.: The EconoMining project at NYU: Studying the Economic Value of User-generated Content on the Internet. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management: Special Issue: Distribution and Revenue Management 8(2-3), 241–246 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steel, E.: Marketers Watch as Friends Interact Online. Wall Street Journal, B5 (April 15, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Valentino-Devries, J.: What They Know About You. Wall Street Journal, B1 (July 31, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Tam, K.Y.: The Effects of Information Format and Shopping Task on Consumers’ Online Shopping Behavior: A Cognitive Fit Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(3), 149–184 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shen, J. (2012). Understanding User’s Acceptance of Social Shopping Websites: Effects of Social Comparison and Trust. In: Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 102. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29958-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29958-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29957-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29958-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics