Skip to main content

A Time-Varying Model to Simulate a Collective Decisional Problem

  • Conference paper
Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 271))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 906 Accesses

Abstract

A group of agents have to decide between two alternatives. At the begining each actor have a preference and a conviction about this preference. During the debate the conviction and the preference of each agent can change under the involved social influences.

The theoretical model of this paper is presented in [7], and the influence model is the one presented in [3]. The aims is to present a new dynamical model for collective decisional problems. Moreover the presented model offers additional perspectives for purposes of controlling the debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonnevay, S., Kabachi, N., Lamure, M., Tounissoux, D.: A multiagent system to aggregate preferences. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Washington, USA, pp. 545–550 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: The symmetric and asymmetric choquet integrals on finite spaces for decision making. Statistical paper, vol. 43, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heudelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grabisch, M., Rusinowska, A.: A model of influence in a social network. Business and Economics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grabisch, M., Rusinowska, A.: Influence in social networks. In: COGIS 2009, Paris (2009b)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoede, C., Bakker, R.: A theory of decisional power. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 8, 309–322 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Imoussaten, A., Montmain, J., Rigaud, E.: Interactions in a Collaborative Decision Making Process: Disturbances or Control Variables? In: COGIS 2009, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rico, A., Bonnevay, S., Lamure, M., Tounissoux, D.A.: Debat modelisation with the Sipos integral. In: LFA 2004, Nantes (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rusinowska, A., De Swart: On some properties of the Hoede-Bakker index. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 31, 267–293 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapley, L.S.: A Value for n-Person Games. In: Kuhn, H., Tucker, A. (eds.) Contribution to the Theory of Games. Annals of Mathematics Studies Princeton, vol. II(28), pp. 303–317 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Imoussaten, A., Montmain, J., Rico, A., Rico, F. (2013). A Time-Varying Model to Simulate a Collective Decisional Problem. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29966-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29966-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29965-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29966-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics