Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Networked Digital Technologies

NDT 2012: Networked Digital Technologies pp 109–122Cite as

Multi-Viewpoints Ontology Alignment Based on Description Logics

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 294))

Abstract

Nowadays the utility of multi-viewpoint approach is widely acknowledged in many areas, such as ontologies domain. The two concepts ontology and viewpoint are complementary, indeed the ontology represents the knowledge shared by multiple users and the viewpoint represents the domain knowledge that is relevant at a given viewpoint. With the coupling of these tow notions, we are talking about multi-viewpoints ontology. Multi-viewpoints ontology gives the same universe of discourse several partial descriptions such that each one is on a particular viewpoint. Due to the decentralized nature of the Web, there always exist multiple multi-viewpoints ontologies for overlapped domains and even for the same domain. Therefore, multi-viewpoints ontology alignment, is necessary to establish interoperation between Web application using different multi-veiwpoints ontologies. In this paper, we approach the problem of aligning multi-viewpoints ontologies. We focus firstly on the definition of multi-viewpoints ontology in description logics extended by a stamping mechanism. Then, we introduce the notion of multi-viewpoints in the alignment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rath, A.S., Devaurs, D., Lindstaedt, S.N.: An Ontology-Based Approach for Detecting Knowledge Intensive Tasks. Journal of Digital Information Management 9(1), 9–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kossmann, M., Odeh, M., Gillies, A., Watts, S.: Ontology-driven Requirements Engineering with Reference to the Aerospace Industry. Journal of E-Technology 1(1), 22–30 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Falquet, G., Mottaz, J.C.L.: Navigation Hypertexte dans une Ontologie Multi-Points de Vue. In: NîmesTIC 2001, France (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hemam, M., Boufaïda, Z.: MVP-OWL: a multi-viewpoints ontology language for the Semantic Web. International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems (IJRIS) 3(3/4), 147–155 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falquet, G., Mottaz, J.C.L.: A Model for the Collaborative Design of Multi-Point-of-View Terminological Knowledge Bases. In: Dieng, R., Matta, N. (eds.) Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories. Kluwer (2002); Preliminary version published in Proceedings of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory workshop of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm(1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benslimane, D., Arara, A., Falquet, G., Maamar, Z., Thiran, P., Gargouri, F.: Contextual Ontologies: Motivations, Challenges, and Solutions. In: Yakhno, T., Neuhold, E.J. (eds.) ADVIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4243, pp. 168–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The LDB Journal 10(4), 334–350 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics IV. LNCS, vol. 3730, pp. 146–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications, ch. 2, pp. 43–95. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica 69(1), 5–40 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D.: Reasoning in expressive description logics. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, ch. 23, pp. 1581–1634. ElsevierScience Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Chapter 3 Description Logics. In: van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(D) Description Logic. In: Proceeding of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 199–204 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bouquet, P., Euzenat, J., Franconi, E., Serafini, L., Stamou, G., Tessaris, S.: Specification of a common framework for characterizing alignment. Deliverable 2.2.1, Knoledge Web NoE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Noy, N., Musen, M.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noy, N., Musen, M.A.: Smart: Automated Support for Oontology Merging and Alignme. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Banff Workshop on Knowledge Acquistion, Modeling, and Management, Banff Algeberta (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ichise, R.,Takeda, H., Honiden, S.: Rule Induction for Concept Hierarchy Alignment. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Learning at the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalfoglou, Y., Hu, B.: CROSI Mapping System (CMS) Results of the 2005 Ontology Alignment Contest. In: K-CAP Integrating Ontologies Workshop 2005, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hemam, M., Boufaida, Z.: Représentation d’ontologies multi-points de vue: une approche basée sur la logique de descriptions. In: 20es Journées Francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC 2009) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benchikha, F., Boufaida, M.: The Viewpoint Mechanism for Object-oriented Databases Modelling, Distribution and Evolution. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 15, 95–110 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: An integrative proximity measure for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of the 1st Intl. Workshop on Semantic Integration, vol. 82 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shi, F., Li, J., Tang, J., Xie, G., Li, H.: Actively Learning Ontology Matching via User Interaction. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 585–600. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmermann, A., Euzenat, J.: Three Semantics for Distributed Systems and Their Relations with Alignment Composition. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zimmermann, A., Duc, C.: Reasonig with a Network of Aligned Ontologies (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Djakhdjakha, L., Hemam, M., Boufaida, Z.: Une approche d’alignment d’une ontologie multi-points de vue et une ontologie classique. In: International Conference on Applied Informatics, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Djakhdjakha, L., Hemam, M.: L’optimisation d’alignement d’une ontologie multi-points de vue et une ontologie classique. In COSI 2010, Algeria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, 08 May 1945 University of Guelma, Guelma, 24000, Algeria

    Lynda Djakhdjakha

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Khenchela, Khenchela, 40000, Algeria

    Mounir Hemam

  3. LIRE Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Mentouri University of Constantine, Constantine, 25000, Algeria

    Lynda Djakhdjakha & Zizette Boufaida

Authors
  1. Lynda Djakhdjakha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mounir Hemam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zizette Boufaida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., P7B 5E1, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

    Rachid Benlamri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Djakhdjakha, L., Hemam, M., Boufaida, Z. (2012). Multi-Viewpoints Ontology Alignment Based on Description Logics. In: Benlamri, R. (eds) Networked Digital Technologies. NDT 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 294. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30566-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30567-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation