Abstract
Security is a crucial matter for Wireless Sensor Networks. With the recent introduction of Energy-Harvesting nodes, it has gained even more importance. By exploiting the ability of scavenging energy from the surrounding environment, the lifespan of a node has drastically increased. This is one of the reasons why security needs a new take in this topic. Traditional solutions may not work in this new domain. Brand new challenges and threats may arise and new solutions have to be designed. In this paper we present a first taxonomy of attacks, focusing on how they change in the energy-harvesting context compared to regular sensor networks. We also discuss existing security solutions specific for the energy harvesting world and comment on the trend that this topic may follow in the future. Finally, we draw a comparison between the cyber-physical attacker we define in our model and adversary models belonging to security protocols verification literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanchet, B.: Computationally Sound Mechanized Proofs of Correspondence Assertions. In: 20th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF 2007), Venice, Italy, pp. 97–111 (2007)
Blanchet, B.: Automatic Verification of Correspondences for Security Protocols. Journal of Computer Security 17(4), 363–434 (2009)
Buchholtz, M., Nielson, H.R., Nielson, F.: A Calculus for Control Flow Analysis of Security Protocols. International Journal of Information Security 2(3-4), 145–167 (2004)
Dolev, D., Yao, A.: On the Security of Public Key Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 29(2), 198–208 (1983)
Basin, D., Cremers, C.: Degrees of Security: Protocol Guarantees in the Face of Compromising Adversaries. In: Dawar, A., Veith, H. (eds.) CSL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6247, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Basin, D.A., Capkun, S., Schaller, P., Schmidt, B.: Formal Reasoning about Physical Properties of Security Protocols. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 14(2), 16 (2011)
Benenson, Z., Cholewinski, P., Freiling, F.: Vulnerabilities and attacks in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensors Networks Security, 22–43 (2008)
Benenson, Z., Dewald, A., Freiling, F.: Presence, Intervention, Insertion: Unifying Attack and Failure Models in Wireless Sensor Networks. University of Mannheim, Technical Report (2009)
Carter, J.L., Wegman, M.N.: Universal classes of hash functions (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 1977, pp. 106–112. ACM, New York (1977)
Lu, J., Liu, S., Wu, Q., Qiu, Q.: Accurate modelling and prediction of energy availability in energy harvesting real-time embedded systems. In: 2010 International Green Computing Conference, pp. 469–476 (2010)
Lupu, T.-G.: Main types of attacks in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Signal, Speech and Image Processing, and 9th WSEAS International Conference on Multimedia, Internet & Video Technologies, SSIP 2009/MIV 2009, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 180–185. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) (2009)
Martins, D., Guyennet, H.: Wireless sensor network attacks and security mechanisms: A short survey. In: 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), pp. 313–320 (2010)
Pelissier, S., Prabhakar, T., Jamadagni, H., Venkatesha Prasad, R., Niemegeers, I.: Providing security in energy harvesting sensor networks. In: Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 452–456. IEEE (2011)
Sen, J.: A survey on wireless sensor network security. CoRR, abs/1011.1529 (2010)
Sudevalayam, S., Kulkarni, P.: Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 13(3), 443–461 (2011)
Taddeo, A.V., Mura, M., Ferrante, A.: Qos and security in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), pp. 1–10 (2010)
Wander, A., Gura, N., Eberle, H., Gupta, V., Shantz, S.: Energy analysis of public-key cryptography for wireless sensor networks. In: Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2005), pp. 324–328 (2005)
Won, D. (ed.): ICISC 2000. LNCS, vol. 2015. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Mauro, A., Papini, D., Vigo, R., Dragoni, N. (2012). Toward a Threat Model for Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Benlamri, R. (eds) Networked Digital Technologies. NDT 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 294. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30566-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30567-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)