Skip to main content

Performance Comparison of Video Compression and Streaming over Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Using MPEG-4 and H.264

  • Conference paper
Book cover Networked Digital Technologies (NDT 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 294))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Video applications are becoming more popular over wireless ad hoc and sensor networks (WAHSNs). However, due to limited resources, WAHSNs need an efficient video-compression technique in order to minimize the amount of data and maximize the quality of video to be transferred over the network. To this end, we have performed NS2 simulations to evaluate the performance of MPEG-4 (MPEG-4 Part 2) and H.264 (MPEG-4 Part 10) video codecs using EvalVid framework and toolset, AODV routing protocol and constant bit rate (CBR) traffic. The results of simulations show that H.264 outperforms in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and end-to-end delay which makes it perfect for video applications over WAHSNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Melodia, T., Akyildiz, I.F.: Research Challenges for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. Distributed Video Sensor Networks, 233–246 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marpe, D., Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G.J.: The H. 264/MPEG4 advanced video coding standard and its applications. IEEE Communications Magazine 44, 134–143 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdel-Hady, M., Ward, R.: A Framework for Evaluating Video Transmission over Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, PacRim 2007, pp. 78–81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G.J., Bjontegaard, G., Luthra, A.: Overview of the H. 264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 13, 560–576 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert, P., De Neve, W., De Neve, P., Moerman, I., Demeester, P., Van de Walle, R.: Rate-distortion performance of H. 264/AVC compared to state-of-the-art video codecs. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 16, 134–140 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ong, E.P., Yang, X., Lin, W., Lu, Z., Yao, S., Lin, X., Rahardja, S., Seng, B.C.: Perceptual quality and objective quality measurements of compressed videos. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 17, 717–737 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., Das, S., et al.: RFC 3561-ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. IETF (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamaci, N., Altunbasak, Y.: Performance comparison of the emerging H. 264 video coding standard with the existing standards. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2003, p. I–345 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raja, G., Mirza, M.J.: Performance comparison of advanced video coding H. 264 standard with baseline H. 263 and H. 263+ standards. In: IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology, ISCIT 2004, pp. 743–746 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, M., Ling, N.: On enhancing H. 264/AVC video rate control by PSNR-based frame complexity estimation. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 51, 281–286 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Nemcic, O., Vranjes, M., Rimac-Drlje, S.: Comparison of H. 264/AVC and MPEG-4 Part 2 coded video. In: ELMAR 2007, pp. 41–44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hewage, C., Karim, H., Worrall, S., Dogan, S., Kondoz, A.: Comparison of stereo video coding support in MPEG-4 MAC, H. 264/AVC and H. 264/SVC. In: Proc. of IET Visual Information Engineering, VIE 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gvozden, G., Gosta, M., Grgic, S.: Comparison of H. 264/AVC and MPEG-4 ASP coding techniques designed for mobile applications using objective quality assessment methods. In: ELMAR 2007, pp. 51–54 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, M., Chang, Y., Yang, F., Wan, S.: Rate-Distortion Criterion Based Picture Padding for Arbitrary Resolution Video Coding Using H. 264/MPEG-4 AVC. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 20, 1233–1241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai, M., Zhang, Y., Loguinov, D.: A unified traffic model for MPEG-4 and H. 264 video traces. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 11, 1010–1023 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Casasempere, J., Sanchez, P., Villameriel, T., Del Ser, J.: Performance evaluation of H. 264/MPEG-4 Scalable Video Coding over IEEE 802.16 e networks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, BMSB 2009, pp. 1–6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai, M.C., Chang, T.S.: High performance context adaptive variable length coding encoder for MPEG-4 AVC/H. 264 video coding. In: IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, APCCAS 2006, pp. 586–589 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Onthriar, K., Loo, K., Xue, Z.: Performance comparison of emerging Dirac video codec with H. 264/AV. In: International Conference on Digital Telecommunications, ICDT 2006, p. 22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ravi, A., Rao, K.R.: Performance Analysis and Comparison of the Dirac Video Codec with H.264/MPEG-4, Part 10. In: Kountchev, R., Nakamatsu, K. (eds.) Advances in Reasoning-Based Image Processing Intelligent Systems. ISRL, vol. 29, pp. 9–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravi, A.: Performance analysis and comparison of the Dirac video codec with H. 264/MPEG-4 Part 10 AVC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klaue, J., Rathke, B., Wolisz, A.: EvalVid – A Framework for Video Transmission and Quality Evaluation. In: Kemper, P., Sanders, W.H. (eds.) TOOLS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2794, pp. 255–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ke, C.H., Lin, C.H., Shieh, C.K., Hwang, W.S.: A novel realistic simulation tool for video transmission over wireless network. In: IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, p. 7 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. EvalVid - A Video Quality Evaluation Tool-set, http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/menue/research/evalvid/

  24. The Network Simulator ns2 Homepage, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akhlaq, M., Sheltami, T.R. (2012). Performance Comparison of Video Compression and Streaming over Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Using MPEG-4 and H.264. In: Benlamri, R. (eds) Networked Digital Technologies. NDT 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 294. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30567-2_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30566-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30567-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics