Skip to main content

A Platform for Recombining Process Knowledge Chunks

  • Conference paper
Book cover Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2012, EMMSAD 2012)

Abstract

We describe ReKon, a platform that contains fine-granular templates, each describing a process knowledge chunk, which may be combined, as needed, to support ad hoc processes needed in large projects. The platform allows user-lead (re)-construction of a process to deal with the unique and emergent needs of a project by leveraging prior knowledge encoded in process chunks. We have populated ReKon with process chunks created from more than 1200 real-world project templates contributed by four consulting organizations. The fine-granularity of process chunks contained in ReKon represents a direct response to the emergent nature of large projects that defies high-volume production processes. The paper develops the underlying meta-model and operations for ReKon that adapt and extend the combination quadrant in Nonaka and Takeuchi’s knowledge creation framework. A two-phase evaluation illustrates the need for ReKon and points to its potential usefulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brownsword, L.: System-of-Systems Navigator: An Approach for Managing System-of-Systems Interoperability, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm, B.: Some future trends and implications for systems and software engineering processes. Systems Engineering 9(1), 1–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam, W.: Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: a case-driven analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 14(2), 175–187 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Purao, S., Paul, S., Smith, S.: Understanding enterprise integration project risks: A focus group study (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brownsword, L., Smith, J.: Promises, expectations, and realities of interoperability: from cots to systems of systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charette, R.: Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum 42(9), 36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, D.: An emergent perspective on interoperation in systems of systems, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fichman, R., Keil, M., Tiwana, A.: Beyond valuation: Options thinking in IT project management. California Management Review 47(2), 74–96 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keil, M., et al.: A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM 41(11), 76–83 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keil, M., et al.: Why software projects escalate: The importance of project management constructs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(3), 251 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallace, L., Keil, M.: Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Communications of the ACM 47(4), 68–73 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N.: SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning 33(1), 5–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A.: Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 9–33 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, M., Haas, M.: Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–28 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haas, M., Hansen, M.: When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal 26(1), 1–24 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons, J., Saunders, C.: Cognitive heuristics in software engineering applying and extending anchoring and adjustment to artifact reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(12), 873–888 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Popper, S., et al.: System of systems symposium: Report on a summer conversation. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington, VA, pp. 21–22 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lam, W., Shankararaman, V.: An enterprise integration methodology. IT Professional 6(2), 40–48 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keil, M.: Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 421–447 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lyytinen, K., Hirschheim, R.: Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tiwana, A., Keil, M.: The one-minute risk assessment tool (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duncan, W.: PMBOK–A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. ZDA: Project Management Institute, PMI (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Napier, N., Keil, M., Tan, F.: IT project managers’ construction of successful project management practice: a repertory grid investigation. Information Systems Journal (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verner, J., Evanco, W.: In-house software development: what project management practices lead to success? IEEE Software 22(1), 86–93 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Aalst, W., van Hee, K.M.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leymann, F., Roller, D.: Production Workflow: Concepts and Techniques. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sheth, A.: From Contemporary Workflow Process Automation to Dynamic Work Activity Coordination and Collaboration. Siggroup Bulletin 18(3), 17–20 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. The Workflow Management Coalition, Terminology & Glossary, Document No. WFMC-TC-1011, http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011_term_glossary_v3.pdf

  29. Petri Nets World, http://www.daimi.au.dk/PetriNets/

  30. Han, Y., Sheth, A.: On Adaptive Workflow Modeling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando, Florida, pp. 108–116 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis, C.A., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Comstock, N., Ellis, C.A. (eds.) Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems, pp. 10–21. ACM SIGOIS, ACM, Milpitas, CA (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. BPMI.org, BPML|BPEL4WS: A convergence path toward a standard BPM stack, August 15 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge. Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tuomi, I.: Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schultze, U., Leidner, D.: Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions. MIS Quarterly 26(3), 213–242 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Graham, A., Pizzo, V.: A question of balance: case studies in strategic knowledge management. European Management Journal 14(4), 338–346 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Sambamurthy, V.: Emergent by Design: Performance and Transformation at Infosys Technologies. Organization Science 17(2), 277 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karunakaran, A., Purao, S., Cameron, B.: From ‘Method Fragments’ to ‘Knowledge Units’: A Fine-Granular Approach. In: International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, AZ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Weston, C., McAlpine, L., Bordonaro, T.: A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 43(3), 29–48 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Purao, S., Karunakaran, A., Cameron, B. (2012). A Platform for Recombining Process Knowledge Chunks. In: Bider, I., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31071-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31072-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics