Skip to main content

Importing Montagovian Dynamics into Minimalism

  • Conference paper
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7351))

Abstract

Minimalist analyses typically treat quantifier scope interactions as being due to movement, thereby bringing constraints thereupon into the purview of the grammar. Here we adapt De Groote’s continuation-based presentation of dynamic semantics to minimalist grammars. This allows for a simple and simply typed compositional interpretation scheme for minimalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abney, S.P.: The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amblard, M.: Calculs de représentations sémantiques et syntaxe générative: les grammaires minimalistes catégorielles. Ph.D. thesis, Université Bordeaux I (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, N., Pogodalla, S.: A montagovian treatment of modal subordination. In: Li, N., Lutz, D. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), vol. 20, pp. 387–405. eLanguage (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barss, A.: Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and its Implications. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R.: Quantification and Syntactic Theory. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cresti, D.: Extraction and reconstruction. Natural Language Semantics 3, 79–122 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Groote, P.: Towards a montagovian account of dynamics. In: Gibson, M., Howell, J. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 16, pp. 1–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Groote, P., Lebedeva, E.: Presupposition accommodation as exception handling. In: Fernandez, R., Katagiri, Y., Komatani, K., Lemon, O., Nakano, M. (eds.) The 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue - SIGDIAL 2010, pp. 71–74. Association for Computational Linguistics, Tokyo (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engelfriet, J.: Context-free graph grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages. Beyond Words, vol. 3, ch.3, pp. 125–213. Springer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, G.: Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2), 337–362 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gärtner, H.M., Michaelis, J.: Some remarks on locality conditions and minimalist grammars. In: Sauerland, U., Gärtner, H.M. (eds.) Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, Studies in Generative Grammar, vol. 89, pp. 161–195. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graf, T.: A tree transducer model of reference-set computation. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 15, Article 4 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graf, T.: Closure Properties of Minimalist Derivation Tree Languages. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 96–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hale, J.T., Stabler, E.P.: Strict Deterministic Aspects of Minimalist Grammars. In: Blache, P., Stabler, E.P., Busquets, J., Moot, R. (eds.) LACL 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3492, pp. 162–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Harkema, H.: Parsing Minimalist Languages. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishers (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hendriks, H.: Studied Flexibility: Categories and types in syntax and semantics. Ph.D. thesis, Universitaet van Amsterdam (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hornstein, N.: Movement and chains. Syntax 1(2), 99–127 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobson, P.: Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2), 117–184 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, K.: How far will quantifiers go? In: Martin, R., Michaels, D., Uriagereka, J. (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ch.5, pp. 187–210. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kanazawa, M., Michaelis, J., Salvati, S., Yoshinaka, R.: Well-Nestedness Properly Subsumes Strict Derivational Minimalism. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 112–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobele, G.M.: Generating Copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kobele, G.M.: Inverse linking via function composition. Natural Language Semantics 18(2), 183–196 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kobele, G.M.: Minimalist Tree Languages Are Closed Under Intersection with Recognizable Tree Languages. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, J.-P. (eds.) LACL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6736, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobele, G.M., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10; ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. LeComte, A.: Semantics in minimalist-categorial grammars. In: de Groote, P. (ed.) FG 2008, pp. 41–59. CSLI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michaelis, J.: On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Potsdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parigot, M.: λμ-Calculus: An Algorithmic Interpretation of Classical Natural Deduction. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) LPAR 1992. LNCS, vol. 624, pp. 190–201. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Pietrowski, P.M.: Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford University Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seki, H., Matsumura, T., Fujii, M., Kasami, T.: On multiple context-free grammars. Theoretical Computer Science 88, 191–229 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Stabler, E.P.: Computing quantifier scope. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, ch. 5, pp. 155–182. Kluwer, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational Minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobele, G.M. (2012). Importing Montagovian Dynamics into Minimalism. In: BĂ©chet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31261-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31262-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics