Abstract
“Power-law” characterization of breast tissues can be achieved in different ways, as can be found in literature. The outcomes of all such characterizations appear to be in line with early observations stating that the power-law exponent β has a value between two and four for mammography images. Ambiguous aspects of power-law characterization and their implementation are addressed in this paper, including data representation, filtering, frequency range and ROI size. It is shown how different implementations have an effect on computed β values, using three different datasets (mammography images, chest x-ray images, and non-medical images). It is found that differences in computed β value within the mammography image dataset can be even larger than the differences between the mammography image dataset, chest x-ray images, and the non-medical images. A clear description of the used methodology is therefore essential for the interpretation and relevance of any power-law characterization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Burgess, A.E.: Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3661, pp. 642–653 (1999)
Chen, L., Boone, J.M., Nosratieh, A., Abbey, C.K.: NPS comparison of anatomical noise characteristics in mammography, tomosynthesis, and breast CT images using power law metrics. Physics 7961, 79610F–79610F-4 (2011)
Li, D., Gavenonis, S., Conant, E., Kontos, D.: Comparison of breast percent density estimation from raw versus processed digital mammograms. Imaging 7963, 79631X–79631X-6 (2011)
Kroft, L., Veldkamp, W., Mertens, B.: Detection of Simulated Nodules on Clinical Radiographs: Dose Reduction at Digital Posteroanterior Chest Radiography. Radiology 241 (2006)
Bliznakova, K., Suryanarayanan, S., Karellas, A., Pallikarakis, N.: Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: Application for mammography. Medical Physics 37, 5604 (2010)
Burgess, A.E., Judy, P.F.: Signal detection in power-law noise: effect of spectrum exponents. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 24, 52–60 (2007)
Engstrom, E., Reiser, I., Nishikawa, R.: Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images. Medical Physics 36, 1753 (2009)
Fredenberg, E., Svensson, B., Danielsson, M., Lazzari, B., Cederstr, B., Ab, M.: Optimization of mammography with respect to anatomical noise. In: SPIE, pp. 1–11 (2011)
Gang, G.J., Lee, J.: Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. Medical Physics 37, 1948–1965 (2010)
Heine, J.J., Velthuizen, R.P.: Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Medical Physics 29, 647 (2002)
Lau, B.A., Reiser, I., Nishikawa, R.M.: Issues in characterizing anatomic structure in digital breast tomosynthesis. Physics 7961, 796113–796113-8 (2011)
Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Chinander, M.R.: Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. Journal of Digital Imaging: The Official Journal of the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology 21, 145–152 (2008)
Metheany, K.G., Abbey, C.K., Packard, N., Boone, J.M.: Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images. Medical Physics 35, 4685 (2008)
Reiser, I., Nishikawa, R.M.: Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds. Medical Physics 33, 2905 (2006)
Reiser, I., Nishikawa, R.M.: Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: Effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. Medical Physics 37, 1591 (2010)
Reiser, I., Lee, S., Nishikawa, R.M.: On the orientation of mammographic structure. Medical Physics 38, 5303 (2011)
Zheng, B., Chang, Y.H., Gur, D.: Adaptive computer-aided diagnosis scheme of digitized mammograms. Academic Radiology 3, 806–814 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kierkels, J.J.M., Veldkamp, W.J.H., Bouwman, R.W., van Engen, R.E. (2012). Power-Law, Beta, and (Slight) Chaos in Automated Mammography Breast Structure Characterization. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_69
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)