Skip to main content

Comparing Direct and Remote Tactile Feedback on Interactive Surfaces

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication (EuroHaptics 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7282))

Abstract

Tactile feedback on touch surfaces has shown to greatly improve the interaction in quantitative and qualitative metrics. Recently, researchers have assessed the notion of remote tactile feedback, i.e., the spatial separation of touch input and resulting tactile output on the user’s body. This approach has the potential to simplify the use of tactile feedback with arbitrary touch devices and allows the design of novel tactile stimuli by stimulus combination. However, a formal comparison of direct and remote tactile feedback during touch input is still missing. Therefore, we conducted three consecutive laboratory studies. First, we compared the effects of both direct and remote tactile stimuli on the user’s performance during touchscreen interactions. No difference was found in the positive effects of both types of feedback. Second, we evaluated the impact of the remote tactile actuator’s position on the user’s body. For remote tactile stimuli, we found improved accuracy and interaction speed, regardless of the body location. Third we analyzed remote tactile feedback under additional cognitive load. The results support the positive effects of tactile feedback on user performance and subjective evaluation. These findings encourage us to further exploit the potential of remote tactile feedback to simplify and expand the multimodal interaction with arbitrary touch interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach-y-Rita, P., Kercel, S.: Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(12), 541–546 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., Harrison, C.: TeslaTouch. In: Proc. UIST 2010, pp. 283–292 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brewster, S., Chohan, F., Brown, L.: Tactile feedback for mobile interactions. In: Proc. CHI 2007, pp. 159–162 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, J., et al.: Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis. In: Proc. ICMI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buxton, W.: Multi-Touch Systems that I Have Known and Loved. Microsoft Research (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chouvardas, V.G., Miliou, A.N., Hatalis, M.K.: Tactile displays: Overview and recent advances. Displays 29, 185–194 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forlines, C., Balakrishnan, R.: Evaluating tactile feedback and direct vs. indirect stylus input in pointing and crossing selection tasks. In: Proc. CHI 2008, pp. 1563–1572 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fukumoto, M., Sugimura, T.: Active click: tactile feedback for touch panels. In: CHI 2001 EA, pp. 121–122 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M.: Deriving Haptic Design Guidelines from Human Physiological, Psychophysical, and Neurological Foundations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24, 33–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison, C., Hudson, S.E.: Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In: Proc. CHI 2009, pp. 299–308 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S.A., Johnston, J.: Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. In: Proc. CHI 2008, pp. 1573–1582 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaczmarek, K.A., Webster, J.G., Bach-y-Rita, P., Tompkins, W.J.: Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 38(1), 1–16 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J., Dietz, P., Leigh, D., Yerazunis, W.: Haptic pen: a tactile feedback stylus for touch screens. In: Proc. UIST 2004, pp. 291–294 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, J.-H., Poliakoff, E., Spence, C.: The Effect of Multimodal Feedback Presented via a Touch Screen on the Performance of Older Adults. In: Altinsoy, M.E., Jekosch, U., Brewster, S. (eds.) HAID 2009. LNCS, vol. 5763, pp. 128–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung, R., MacLean, K., Bertelsen, M., Saubhasik, M.: Evaluation of Haptically Augmented Touchscreen GUI Elements under Cognitive Load. In: Proc. ICMI 2007, pp. 374–381 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: CHI 2003 EA, p. 754 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marquardt, N., Nacenta, M., Young, J., Carpendale, S., Greenberg, S., Sharlin, E.: The Haptic Tabletop Puck: Tactile Feedback for Interactive Tabletops. In: Proc. ITS 2009, pp. 93–100 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McAdam, C., Brewster, S.: Distal tactile feedback for text entry on tabletop computers. In: Proc. BCS-HCI 2009, pp. 504–511 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nashel, A., Razzaque, S.: Tactile virtual buttons for mobile devices. In: CHI 2003 EA, pp. 854–855 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oakley, I., McGee, M.R., Brewster, S., Gray, S.: Putting the Feel in Look and Feel. In: Proc. CHI 2000, pp. 415–422 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piper, B., Ratti, C., Ishii, H.: Illuminating clay: a 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis. In: Porc. CHI 2002, pp. 355–362 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Potter, R.L., Weldon, L.J., Shneiderman, B.: Improving the accuracy of touchscreens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. Sparks of Innovation in Human-Computer Interaction, 161 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poupyrev, I., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J.: Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. In: Proc. UIST 2002, pp. 51–60 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richter, H., Blaha, B., Wiethoff, A., Baur, D., Butz, A.: Tactile Feedback without a Big Fuss. In: Proc. UbiComp 2011, pp. 85–89 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richter, H., Ecker, R., Deisler, C., Butz, A.: HapTouch and the 2 + 1 State Model. In: Proc. Automotive UI 2010, pp. 72–79 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richter, H., Löhmann, S., Wiethoff, A.: HapticArmrest: Remote Tactile Feedback on Touch Surfaces Using Combined Actuators. In: Keyson, D.V., Maher, M.L., Streitz, N., Cheok, A., Augusto, J.C., Wichert, R., Englebienne, G., Aghajan, H., Kröse, B.J.A. (eds.) AmI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7040, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Richter, H., Loehmann, S., Weinhart, F., Butz, A. (2012). Comparing Direct and Remote Tactile Feedback on Interactive Surfaces. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7282. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31400-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31401-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics