Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Load Can Explain Differences in Active and Passive Touch

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication (EuroHaptics 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7282))

Abstract

Active touch is often described as yielding “better-quality” information than passive touch. However, some authors have argued that passive-guided movements generate superior percepts due to a reduction in demands on the haptic sensory system. We consider the possibility that passive-guided conditions, as used in most active-passive comparisons, are relatively free from cognitive decision-making, while active conditions involve cognitive loads that are quite high and uncharacteristic of normal sensory processes. Thus studies that purport to show differences in active and passive touch may instead be revealing differences in the amount of cognition involved in active and passive tasks. We hypothesized that passive-guided conditions reduce not the sensory load but the cognitive load that active explorers must bear. To test this hypothesis Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) activity was measured using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during active and passive-guided fingertip exploration of 2D raised line drawings. Active movements resulted in greater activation (compared with passive movements) in areas implicated in higher order processes such as monitoring and controlling of goal-directed behavior, attention, execution of movements, and error detection. Passive movements, in contrast, produced greater BOLD activity in areas associated with touch perception, length discrimination, tactile object recognition, and efference copy. The activation of a greater number of higher-order processing areas during active relative to passive-guided exploration suggests that instances of passive-guided superiority may not be due to the haptic system’s limited ability to cope with sensory inputs, but rather the restriction imposed by the use of a single finger such that active exploration may require cognitive strategies not demanded in the passive condition. Our findings suggest that previous attempts to compare active and passive touch have, in order to simplify tasks, inadvertently introduced cognitive load at the expense of normal sensory inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gibson, J.J.: Observations on active touch. Psychological Review 69(6), 477–490 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakemore, S.J., Rees, G., Frith, C.D.: How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia 36(6), 521–529 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Symmons, M.A., Richardson, B.L., Wuillemin, D.B.: Components of haptic information: Skin rivals kinaesthesis. Perception 37(10), 1596–1604 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grezes, J., Decety, J.: Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 12, 1–19 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blakemore, S.J., Oakley, D.A., Frith, C.D.: Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia 41, 1058–1067 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, M.S., Lundbye-Jensen, J., Geertsen, S.S., Petersen, T.H., Paulson, O.B., Nielsen, J.B.: Premotor cortex modulates somatosensory cortex during voluntary movements without proprioceptive feedback. Nature Neuroscience 10(4), 417–419 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Büchel, C., Friston, K.J.: Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 7, 768–778 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blankenburg, F., Ruff, C.C., Deichmann, R., Rees, G., Driver, J.: The cutaneous rabbit illusion affects human primary sensory cortex somatotopically. PLoS Biology 4, e69 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Magee, L.E., Kennedy, J.M.: Exploring pictures tactually. Nature 283, 287–288 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson, B.L., Wuillemin, D.B.: Can passive tactile perception be better than active? Nature 292, 90 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson, B.L., Wuillemin, D.B., MacKintosh, G.J.: Can passive touch be better than active touch? A comparison of active and passive tactile maze learning. British Journal of Psychology 72(3), 353–362 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Symmons, M.A., Richardson, B.L., Wuillemin, D.B.: Active versus passive touch: Superiority depends more on the task than the mode. In: Ballesteros, S., Heller, M.A. (eds.) Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, pp. 179–185. Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, Madrid (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simões-Franklin, C., Whitaker, T.A., Newell, F.N.: Active touch vs. passive touch in roughness discrimination: An fMRI study. Poster presented at the 9th International Multisensory Research Forum, Hamburg, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mima, T., Sadato, N., Yazawa, S., Hanakawa, T., Fukuyama, H., Yonekura, Y., Shibasaki, H.: Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain 122(10), 1989–1997 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiller, C., Jüptner, M., Fellows, S., Rijntjes, M., Leonhardt, G., Kiebel, S., Muller, S., Diener, H.C., Thilmann, A.F.: Brain representation of active and passive movements. NeuroImage 4, 105–110 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colebatch, J.G., Deiber, M.P., Passingham, R.E., Friston, K.J., Frackowiak, R.S.: Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 65, 1392–1401 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kawashima, R., Roland, P.E., O’Sullivan, B.T.: Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to ipsilateral hand movements. Brain Research 663, 2511–2516 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks, D.J.: The role of the basal ganglia in motor control: Contributions from PET. Journal of Neurological Science 128, 1–13 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephan, K.M., Fink, G.R., Passingham, R.E., Silbersweig, D., Ceballos-Baumann, A.O., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.: Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology 73(1), 373–386 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marchand, W.R., Lee, J.N., Thatcher, J.W., Hsu, E.W., Rashkin, E., Suchy, Y., Chelune, G., Starr, J., Barbera, S.S.: Putamen coactivation during motor task execution. Neuroreport 19(9), 957–960 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattingley, J.B., Hussain, M., Rorden, C., Kennard, C., Driver, J.: Motor role of human inferior parietal role revealed in unilateral neglect patients. Nature 392, 179–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bush, G., Luu, P., Posner, M.I.: Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science 4(6), 215–222 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shima, K., Tanji, J.: Both supplementary and presupplementary motor areas are crucial for the temporal organization of multiple movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 80, 3247–3260 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oldfield, R.C.: The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1), 97–113 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, J.W., Braver, T.S.: Learned predictions of error likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Science 307, 1118–1121 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown, J.W.: Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: Multiple response effects and context specific representations. NeuroImage 47, 334–341 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A.: Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10, 295–307 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Garavan, H., Ross, T.J., Stein, E.A.: Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96, 8301–8306 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pardo, J.V., Fox, P.T., Raichle, M.E.: Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 349, 61–64 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen, A.C., Rao, S.M., Caffarra, P., Scaglioni, A., Bobholz, J.A., Woodley, S.J., Hammeke, T.A., Cunningham, J.M., Prieto, T.E., Binder, J.R.: Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(2), 135–152 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reddy, H., Floyer, A., Donaghy, M., Matthews, P.M.: Altered cortical activation with finger movement after peripheral denervation: Comparison of active and passive tasks. Experimental Brain Research 138(4), 484–491 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gao, J.H., Parsons, L.M., Bower, J.M., Xiong, J., Li, J., Fox, P.T.: Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science 272, 482–483 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Slotnick, S.D., Schacter, D.L.: A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories. Nature Neuroscience 7, 664–672 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C.: Mirrors in the brain: How we share our actions and emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grill-Spector, K., Kourtzi, Z., Kanwisher, N.: The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research 41(10-11), 1409–1422 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. James, T.W., Servos, P., Kilgour, A.R., Huh, E.J., Lederman, S.: The influence of familiarity on brain activation during haptic exploration of 3-D facemasks. Neuroscience Letters 397, 269–273 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kitada, R., Johnsrude, I., Kochiyama, T., Lederman, S.J.: Functional specialization and convergence in the occipito-temporal cortex supporting haptic and visual identification of human faces and body parts: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21, 1–19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thangavel, R., Sahu, S.K., Van Hoesen, G.W., Zaheer, A.: Modular and laminar pathology of Brodmann’s area 37 in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 152(1), 50–55 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J.: Do intention and exploration modulate the pathways to haptic object identification? Behavioural and Brain Sciences 30(2), 213–214 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zelano, C., Bensafi, M., Porter, J., Mainland, J., Johnson, B., Bremner, E., Telles, C., Khan, R., Sobel, N.: Attentional modulation in human primary olfactory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8(1), 114–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Philips, J.R., Johnson, K.O., Browne, H.M.: A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Perception & Psychophysics 34, 243–249 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Voss, M., Ingram, J.N., Haggard, P., Wolpert, D.M.: Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nature Neuroscience 9(1), 26–27 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological Studies, Monash University, Churchill, 3842, Australia

    George H. Van Doorn, Dianne B. Wuillemin, Barry L. Richardson & Mark A. Symmons

  2. Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Australia

    Vladimir Dubaj

Authors
  1. George H. Van Doorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vladimir Dubaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dianne B. Wuillemin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barry L. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark A. Symmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Science, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland

    Poika Isokoski  & Jukka Springare  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Doorn, G.H., Dubaj, V., Wuillemin, D.B., Richardson, B.L., Symmons, M.A. (2012). Cognitive Load Can Explain Differences in Active and Passive Touch. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7282. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31401-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31400-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31401-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation