Abstract
Iconic constraints play an important role in the semantics of sign language in general, and of sign language pronominals in particular (e.g. Cuxac 1999, Taub 2001, Liddell 2003, Lillo-Martin and Meier 2011). But the field is sharply divided among two camps: (a) specialists of formal linguistics (e.g. Neidle et al. 2000, Lillo-Martin 1991, Sandler and Lillo-Martin 2006) primarily attempt to integrate sign language pronominals to universal models of anaphora, giving iconic phenomena a peripheral position; (b) specialists who emphasize the centrality of iconicity (e.g. Taub 2001, Liddell 2003) do so within informal frameworks that are not considered as sufficiently explicit by the formalist side. We attempt to reconcile insights from the two camps within a formal semantics with iconicity (Schlenker 2011a). We analyze three kinds of iconic effects: (i) structural iconicity, in which relations of embedding among loci are directly reflected in their denotations; (ii) locus-external iconicity, in which the high position of a locus in signing space has a direct semantic reflex; and (iii) locus-internal iconicity, where different parts of a structured locus are targeted by different directional verbs, as was argued by Liddell. We suggest that these phenomena can be understood if the interpretive procedure can, at the level of variables, impose an ’iconic mapping’ between loci and the objects they denote.
Many thanks Jason Lamberton and Wes Whalen for help with the ASL data, to Oliver Pouliot for help with some transcriptions, as well as to Igor Casas for discussion of related LSF data (not reported here). Sign language consultants are not responsible for the claims made here, nor for any errors. The present work was supported by an NSF grant (BCS 0902671) and by a Euryi grant from the European Science Foundation (‘Presupposition: A Formal Pragmatic Approach’). Neither foundation is responsible for the claims made here. The research reported in this piece also contributes to the COST Action IS1006.
Contribution of each author: Philippe Schlenker initiated the project and is responsible for all claims and errors. Jonathan Lamberton is a co-author for research in progress reported in Section 3 (iconic effects with directional verbs), and he was an ASL informant for all parts of the project.
Overlap with other works: Section 1 shares material with Schlenker 2011b. Section 2 is almost identical with Schlenker, to appear (with approval from Snippets). The analyses of Sections 3 and 4 are modified versions of ones sketched in Schlenker 2011a.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cuxac, C.: French Sign Language: Proposition of a Structural Explanation by Iconicity. In: Braffort, A., Gibet, S., Teil, D., Gherbi, R., Richardson, J. (eds.) GW 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1739, pp. 165–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Koulidobrova, E.: SELF: Intensifier and ‘long distance’ effects in American Sign Language (ASL). Manuscript, University of Connecticut (2011)
Liddell, S.K.: Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Lillo-Martin, D.: Universal grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)
Lillo-Martin, D., Klima, E.S.: Pointing out Differences: ASL Pronouns in Syntactic Theory. In: Fischer, S.D., Siple, P. (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 191–210. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)
Lillo-Martin, D., Meier, R.: On the linguistic status of ’agreement’ in sign language. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3-4), 95–141 (2011)
Neidle, C., et al.: The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. MIT Press (2000)
Nouwen, R.: Plural pronominal anaphora in context. Number 84 in Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics Dissertations, LOT, Utrecht (2003)
Sandler, W., Lillo-Martin, D.: Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge University Press (2006)
Schlenker, P.: Iconic Agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3-4), 223–234 (2011a)
Schlenker, P.: Donkey Anaphora: the View from Sign Language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics & Philosophy 34(4), 341–395 (2011b)
Schlenker, P.: Complement Set Anaphora and Structural Iconicity in ASL. To appear in Snippets (to appear)
Taub, S.F.: Language from the body. Cambridge University Press (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schlenker, P., Lamberton, J. (2012). Formal Indices and Iconicity in ASL. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)