Skip to main content

Degree Modification and Intensification in American Sign Language Adjectives

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

Abstract

Scalar adjectives lacking closed upper boundaries (like far) can be coerced to have a closed upper boundary reading when combined with degree modification with too, e.g. too far to walk. Parallel to the mapping of event structure to scalar structure in adjectives [4], we observe that scalar adjectives are end-marked in ASL. These adjectives receive marking similar to telic verbs, indicating that, like the visibility of event structure in verbs, scalar structure, or at least the upper boundary, is also visible in ASL. The Event Visibility Hypothesis (EVH) was formulated based on the observation that telic verb signs are distinguished from atelics by end-marking reflecting final states of telic events. Here, it is extended to a general Visibility Hypothesis for sign languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. MacLaughlin, D.: The Structure of Determiner Phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. Dissertation, Boston University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernath, J.: Adjectives in ASL. In: 10th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, pp. 162–163. Purdue University, West Lafayette (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilbur, R.B.: Complex Predicates Involving Events, Time and Aspect: Is This Why Sign Languages Look So Similar? In: Quer, J. (ed.) Signs of the Time, pp. 217–250. Signum, Hamburg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates. Lang. 81, 345–381 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and Grammar: Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. Ling & Philo 30, 1–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: From Event Structure to Scale Structure: Degree Modification in Deverbal Adjectives. In: Mathews, T., Strolovitch, D. (eds.) SALT IX, pp. 163–180. CLC Publications, Ithaca (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brentari, D.: Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilbur, R.B.: Effects of Varying Rate of Signing on ASL Manual Signs and Nonmanual Markers. Lang. and Sp. 52(2/3), 245–285 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilbur, R.B.: The Semantics-Phonology Interface. In: Brentari, D. (ed.) Cambridge Language Surveys: Sign Languages, pp. 357–382. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meier, C.: The Meaning of Too, Enough, and So... That. Nat. Lang. Seman. 11, 69–107 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. von Stechow, A.: Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison. J. Seman. 3, 1–77 (1984a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. von Stechow, A.: My Reaction to Cresswell’s, Hellan’s, Hoeksema’s and Seuren’s Comments. J. Seman. 3, 183–199 (1984b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schalber, K.: Phonological Visibility of Event Structure in Austrian Sign Language: A Comparison of ASL and OGS. MA Thesis, Purdue University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malaia, E., Wilbur, R.B.: Kinematic Signatures of Telic and Atelic Events in ASL Predicates. Lang. and Sp. 55(3), November 21 (2011), doi:10.1177/0023830911422201

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malaia, E., Ranaweera, R., Wilbur, R.B., Talavage, T.M.: Neural Representation of Event Structure in American Sign Language: fMRI Comparison of Cortical Activations in Deaf Signers and Hearing Non-signers. Neuroimage 59, 4094–4101 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Demonte, V.: Adjectives. In: Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K., Portner, P. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bosworth, R., Dobkins, K.: Visual Field Asymmetries for Motion Processing in Deaf and Hearing Signers. Brain and Cognition 49, 170–181 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bosworth, R., Bartlett, M., Dobkins, K.: Image Statistics of American Sign Language: Comparison with Faces and Natural Scenes. J. Optical Society America 23(9), 2085–2096 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddell, S.K.: Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In: Siple, P. (ed.) Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, pp. 59–90. Academic Press, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilbur, R.B., Malaia, E., Shay, R.A. (2012). Degree Modification and Intensification in American Sign Language Adjectives. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics