Skip to main content

A Brief Account on the Recent Advances in the Use of Quantum Mechanics for Information Retrieval

  • Chapter
New Challenges in Distributed Information Filtering and Retrieval

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 439))

  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

The key challenge of Information Retrieval (IR) is relevance, that is, the property of a document that makes the document relevant to the end user’s information need in a given context. Relevance is a key challenge because it is an unknown property – were every document at every context marked with a relevance assessment prior to any information need or were it indexed so that a set of terms is assigned if and only if the document is relevant, retrieval would be perfect. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Although an IR system is in principle able to optimally rank documents, retrieval effectiveness depends on how the document collection has been represented, e.g. which terms are associated to which documents.

Quantum Theory (QT) can be used in IR because its mathematics describes the properties of documents and queries which would outperform the current retrieval models if these properties could be observed. Using QT in a different domain than Physics is not obvious, thus making the use of QT in IR is useful and in fact necessary.

To this end, we describe how to use QT in, and we explain how QT can improve the current situation of IR. In particular, we suggest how measurement uncertainty can be leveraged in IR for designing novel retrieval functions constrasting current retrieval functions which are based on the uncertainty generated at indexing time. Moreover, we describe IR in terms of signal detection. By viewing retrieval as signal detection, it is possible to cast some results of quantum signal detection to IR and define the procedures for designing an indexing algorithms which better represents documents than traditional algorithms. Lastly, we describe some experimental results that suggest the potential of QT in IR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robertson, S.: The probability ranking principle in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 33, 294–304 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lalmas, M., Ruthven, I.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: A survey of automatic query expansion in information retrieval. ACM Comput. Surv. 44, 1:1–1:50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ingwersen, P., Järvelin, K.: The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mizzaro, S.: Relevance: The whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, 810–832 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 1915–1933 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 2126–2144 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neyman, J., Pearson, E.: On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 231, 289–337 (1933)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Melucci, M.: Can Information Retrieval Systems Be Improved Using Quantum Probability? In: Amati, G., Crestani, F. (eds.) ICTIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6931, pp. 139–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Helstrom, C.: Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory. Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wootters, W.K.: Statistical distance and Hilbert space. Phys. Rev. D 23, 357–362 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Accardi, L.: On the probabilistic roots of the quantum mechanical paradoxes. In: Diner, S., de Broglie, L. (eds.) The Wave-Particle Dualism, pp. 297–330. D. Reidel pub. co. (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Accardi, L., Fedullo, A.: On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 34, 161–172 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitowsky, I.: Quantum Probability – Quantum Logic. Springer (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melucci, M.: An Investigation of Quantum Interference in Information Retrieval. In: Cunningham, H., Hanbury, A., Rüger, S. (eds.) IRFC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6107, pp. 136–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Buccio, E., Melucci, M., Song, D.: Towards Predicting Relevance Using a Quantum-Like Framework. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 755–758. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. van Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London (1979), Disponibile in formato elettronico ipertestuale all’indirizzo http://www.dei.unipd.it/~melo/htb/

    Google Scholar 

  18. Di Buccio, E., Melucci, M., Song, D.: Exploring combinations of sources for interaction features for document re-ranking (2010), http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/ryenw/hcir2010/docs/HCIR2010Proceedings.pdf

  19. van Rijsbergen, K.: The geometry of information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, UK (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Melucci, M., van Rijsbergen, K.: Quantum mechanics and information retrieval. In: Advanced Topics in Information Retrieval, pp. 125–155. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent quantum theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hughes, R.: The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parthasarathy, K.: An Introduction to Quantum Stochastic Calculus, Birkhäuser (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bruza, P., Kitto, K., Nelson, D., McEvoy, C.: Extracting Spooky-Activation-at-a-Distance from Considerations of Entanglement. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Cariolaro, G., Pierobon, G.: Performance of quantum data transmission systems in the presence of thermal noise. IEEE Transactions on Communications 58, 623–630 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zuccon, G., Azzopardi, L.A., van Rijsbergen, K.: The Quantum Probability Ranking Principle for Information Retrieval. In: Azzopardi, L., Kazai, G., Robertson, S., Rüger, S., Shokouhi, M., Song, D., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) ICTIR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5766, pp. 232–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Piwowarski, B., Frommholz, I., Lalmas, M., van Rijsbergen, K.: What can quantum theory bring to information retrieval? In: Proc. 19th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 59–68 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huertas-Rosero, A., Azzopardi, L., van Rijsbergen, K.: Eraser lattices and semantic contents: An exploration of the semantic contents in order relations between erasers. In: [35], pp. 266–275

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zuccon, G., Azzopardi, L.: Using the quantum probability ranking principle to rank interdependent documents. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 357–369 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34, 176–205 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Busemeyer, J.R.: Introduction to Quantum Probability for Social and Behavioral Scientists. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494, pp. 1–2. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Hou, Y., Song, D.: Characterizing pure high-order entanglements in lexical semantic spaces via information geometry. In: [35], pp. 237–250

    Google Scholar 

  34. Melucci, M.: An Investigation of Quantum Interference in Information Retrieval. In: Cunningham, H., Hanbury, A., Rüger, S. (eds.) IRFC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6107, pp. 136–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.): QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Melucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melucci, M. (2013). A Brief Account on the Recent Advances in the Use of Quantum Mechanics for Information Retrieval. In: Lai, C., Semeraro, G., Vargiu, E. (eds) New Challenges in Distributed Information Filtering and Retrieval. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31546-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31546-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31545-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31546-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics