Skip to main content

Classification Based on Possibilistic Likelihood

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IPMU 2012)

Abstract

Classification models usually associate one class for each new instance. This kind of prediction doesn’t reflect the uncertainty that is inherent in any machine learning algorithm. Probabilistic approaches rather focus on computing a probability distribution over the classes. However, making such a computation may be tricky and requires a large amount of data. In this paper, we propose a method based on the notion of possibilistic likelihood in order to learn a model that associates a possibility distribution over the classes to a new instance. Possibility distributions are here viewed as an upper bound of a family of probability distributions. This allows us to capture the epistemic uncertainty associated with the model in a faithful way. The model is based on a set of kernel functions and is obtained through an optimization process performed by a particle swarm algorithm. We experiment our method on benchmark dataset and compares it with a naive Bayes classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benferhat, S., Tabia, K.: An Efficient Algorithm for Naive Possibilistic Classifiers with Uncertain Inputs. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 63–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgelt, C., Kruse, R.: Efficient maximum projection of database-induced multivariate possibility distributions. In: Proc. 7th IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 663–668 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cover, T.M., Hart, P.E.: Nearest neighbour pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13, 21–27 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D.: Possibility theory and statistical reasoning. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51, 47–69 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D.: The Role of Epistemic Uncertainty in Risk Analysis. In: Deshpande, A., Hunter, A. (eds.) SUM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6379, pp. 11–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., Prade, H.: Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities. Reliable Computing 10, 273–297 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: When upper probabilities are possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 65–74 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On data summarization with fuzzy sets. In: Proc. of the 5th Inter. Fuzzy Systems Assoc. World Congress (IFSA 1993), Seoul, pp. 465–468 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sandri, S.: On possibility/probability transformations. In: Proceedings of Fourth IFSA Conference, pp. 103–112. Kluwer Academic Publ. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenhani, I., Ben Amor, N., Elouedi, Z.: Decision trees as possibilistic classifiers. Inter. J. of Approximate Reasoning 48(3), 784–807 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langley, P., Iba, W., Thompson, K.: An analysis of bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1992, vol. 7, pp. 223–228 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mauris, G.: Inferring a possibility distribution from very few measurements. In: Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision. Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 48, pp. 92–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmman, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Serrurier, M., Prade, H.: Imprecise Regression Based on Possibilistic Likelihood. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds.) SUM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6929, pp. 447–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Serrurier, M., Prade, H.: Maximum-likelihood principle for possibility distributions viewed as families of probabilities (regular paper). In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 2987–2993 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy sets and systems 1, 3–25 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Serrurier, M., Prade, H. (2012). Classification Based on Possibilistic Likelihood. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31717-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31718-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics