Abstract
Interventions are tools used to distinguish between mere correlations and causal relationships. These standard interventions are assumed to have certain consequences, i.e. they succeed to put their target into one specific state. In this paper, we propose to handle interventions with uncertain consequences. The uncertainty is formalized with the belief function theory which is known to be a general framework allowing the representation of several kinds of imperfect data. Graphically, we investigate the use of belief function causal networks to model the results of passively observed events and also the results of interventions with uncertain consequences. To compute the effect of these interventions, altered structures namely, belief mutilated graphs and belief augmented graphs with uncertain effects are used.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ben Yaghlane, B., Mellouli, K.: Inference in directed evidential networks based on the transferable belief model. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 48(2), 399–418 (2008)
Benferhat, S., Smaoui, S.: Possibilistic causal networks for handling interventions: A new propagation algorithm. In: AAAI, pp. 373–378 (2007)
Boukhris, I., Benferhat, S., Elouedi, Z.: Representing Belief Function Knowledge with Graphical Models. In: Xiong, H., Lee, W.B. (eds.) KSEM 2011. LNCS, vol. 7091, pp. 233–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Boukhris, I., Elouedi, Z., Benferhat, S.: Modeling interventions using belief causal networks. In: FLAIRS 2011, pp. 602–607 (2011)
Chan, H., Darwiche, A.: On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence. Artif. Intell. 163(1), 67–90 (2005)
Darwiche, A.: Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press (2009)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: On the unicity of Dempster rule of combination. Int. J. Intell. System 1, 133–142 (1986)
Dubois, D.: Information Fusion and Revision in Qualitative and Quantitative Settings. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS, vol. 6717, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Eberhardt, F., Scheines, R.: Interventions and causal inference. Philos. Sci. 74, 981–995 (2007)
Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning about Uncertainty. The MIT Press (2003)
Ichihashi, H., Tanaka, H.: Jeffrey-like rules of conditioning for the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Inter. J. Approx. Reasoning 3, 143–156 (1989)
Jeffrey, R.C.: The Logic of Decision, 2nd edn. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)
Korb, K.B., Hope, L.R., Nicholson, A.E., Axnick, K.: Varieties of Causal Intervention. In: Zhang, C., W. Guesgen, H., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3157, pp. 322–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Ma, J., Liu, W., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Bridging jeffrey’s rule, agm revision and dempster conditioning in the theory of evidence. Int. J. Art. Intell. Tools 20(4), 691–720 (2011)
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1988)
Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasonning and Inference. Cambridge University Press (2000)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1976)
Shafer, G.: Jeffrey’s rule of conditioning. Philisophy of Sciences 48, 337–362 (1981)
Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(5), 447–458 (1990)
Smets, P.: About updating. In: UAI 1991, pp. 378–385 (1991)
Smets, P.: Jeffrey’s rule of conditioning generalized to belief functions. In: UAI 1993, pp. 500–505 (1993)
Teng, C.M.: Applications of causal inference. In: ISAIM (2012)
Xu, H., Smets, P.: Evidential reasoning with conditional belief functions. In: UAI 1994, pp. 598–606 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boukhris, I., Elouedi, Z., Benferhat, S. (2012). Handling Interventions with Uncertain Consequences in Belief Causal Networks. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_60
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31717-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31718-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)