Skip to main content

Opening Reciprocal Relations w.r.t. Stochastic Transitivity

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IPMU 2012)

Abstract

For crisp as well as fuzzy relations, the results concerning transitive closures and openings are well known. For reciprocal relations transitivity is often defined in terms of stochastic transitivity. This paper focuses on stochastic transitive openings of reciprocal relations, presenting theoretical results as well as a practical method to construct such transitive openings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandler, W., Kohout, L.J.: Special properties, closures and interiors of crisp and fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 26, 317–331 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, K.: Fuzzy revealed preference theory. J. Econom. Theory 32, 212–227 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek, J., Spillman, B., Spillman, R.: A fuzzy relational space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 255–268 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boixader, D., Recasens, J.: Transitive openings. In: Proceedings of the 7th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2011) and LFA 2011, pp. 493–497 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Herrera, F.: Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17, 14–23 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Baets, B., De Meyer, H.: On the existence and construction of T-transitive closures. Information Sciences 152, 167–179 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. De Baets, B., De Meyer, H.: Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 152, 249–270 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. De Baets, B., De Meyer, H., De Schuymer, B., Jenei, S.: Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations. Social Choice and Welfare 26, 217–238 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. De Meyer, H., Naessens, H., De Baets, B.: Algorithms for computing the min-transitive closure and associated partition tree of a symmetric fuzzy relation. European Journal of Operational Research 155, 226–238 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Floyd, R.W.: Algorithm 97: shortest path. Communications of the ACM 5(6), 345 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freson, S., De Meyer, H., De Baets, B.: An Algorithm for Generating Consistent and Transitive Approximations of Reciprocal Preference Relations. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. LNCS, vol. 6178, pp. 564–573. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Freson, S., De Meyer, H., De Baets, B.: On the transitive closure of reciprocal [0,1]-valued relations. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2011) and LFA 2011, pp. 1015–1021 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Monjardet, B.: A generalisation of probabilistic consistency: linearity conditions for valued preference relations. In: Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M. (eds.) Non-conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. LNEMS, vol. 301. Springer (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montero, F.J., Tejada, J.: Some problems on the definition of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 45–53 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. LNEMS, vol. 301, pp. 54–71 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freson, S., De Meyer, H., De Baets, B. (2012). Opening Reciprocal Relations w.r.t. Stochastic Transitivity. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 300. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31723-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31724-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics