Skip to main content

Distance–Based Characterization of Inconsistency in Pairwise Comparisons

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IPMU 2012)

Abstract

This paper deals with the evaluation of preference consistency in decision making, assuming that decision makers express their preferences by means of pairwise comparisons in the set of alternatives. Preferences can be expressed using one of the various known representations, such as fuzzy preference relations or multiplicative pairwise comparison matrices. A geometrical characterization of inconsistency evaluation is proposed by considering a pairwise comparison matrix as a point in the vector space of square matrices of order n and by using different metrics to measure deviation of this matrix from full consistency. An inconsistency index is defined as the minimum distance of a pairwise comparison matrix from a consistent one, according to a fixed metric. Consequently, to each choice of a particular metric corresponds an inconsistency index. Geometrical properties of the subset of consistent matrices are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barzilai, J.: Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 7, 123–132 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunelli, M., Fedrizzi, M.: Characterizing properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices. Submitted to European Journal of Operational Research (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunelli, M., Canal, L., Fedrizzi, M.: Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: a numerical study. Submitted to Annals of Operations Research (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cavallo, B., D’Apuzzo, L.: Characterizations of Consistent Pairwise Comparison Matrices over Abelian Linearly Ordered Groups. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25, 1035–1059 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavallo, B., D’Apuzzo, L., Squillante, M.: About a consistency index for Pairwise Comparison Matrices over a divisible alo-group. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 27, 153–175 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, H.: Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 122, 277–291 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Choo, E.U., Wedley, W.C.: A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers and Operations Research 31, 893–908 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu, A.T.W., Kalaba, R.E., Springarn, K.: A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 27, 321–538 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu, M.T.: On the optimal consistent approximation to pairwise comparison matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications 272, 155–168 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, W.D., Kress, M.: Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach. European Journal of Operational Research 37, 355–362 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Crawford, G., Williams, C.: A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29, 25–40 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fedrizzi, M.: On a consensus measure in a group MCDM problem. In: Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.) Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Theory and Decision Library. Series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, vol. 18, pp. 231–241. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dortrecht (1990), http://www.unitn.it/files/download/10528/9_2010.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Marques Pereira, R.A.: On the issue of consistency in dynamical consensual aggregation. In: Bouchon Meunier, B., Gutierrez Rios, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems. STUDFUZZ, vol. 89, pp. 129–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fichtner, J.: Some thoughts about the mathematics of the analytic hierarchy process. Report 8403, Institut für Angewandte Systemforschung und Operations Research, Hochschule der Bundeswehr München (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fichtner, J.: On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons. Socio–Econ. Plann. Sci. 20, 341–345 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gantmacher, F.R.: The theory of matrices, Chelsea, vol. 1 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golden, B.L., Wang, Q.: An alternate measure of consistency. In: Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A., Harker, P.T. (eds.) The Analythic Hierarchy Process, Applications and Studies, pp. 68–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Koczkodaj, W.W.: A new definition of consistency or pairwise comparisons. Mathematical & Computer Modelling 18, 79–84 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Koczkodaj, W.W., Orlowski, M.: An orthogonal basis for computing a consistent approximation to a pairwise comparison matrix. Computers Math. Applic. 34, 41–47 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Peláez, J.I., Lamata, M.T.: A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 46, 1839–1845 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramík, J., Korviny, P.: Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements on the geometric mean. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161, 1604–1613 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Saaty, T.L.: Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 74, 426–447 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., Daigo, M.: Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHP. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 41, 404–414 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Stein, W.E., Mizzi, P.J.: The harmonic consistency index for the analythic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 177, 488–497 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fedrizzi, M. (2012). Distance–Based Characterization of Inconsistency in Pairwise Comparisons. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 300. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31723-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31724-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics