Skip to main content

Performance and Robustness Analysis for Some Re-sampling Detection Techniques in Digital Images

  • Conference paper
Digital Forensics and Watermarking (IWDW 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7128))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In order to create convincing forged images, manipulated images are usually exposed to some geometric operations which require a re-sampling step. Therefore, detecting traces of re-sampling became an important approach in the field of image forensics. There are many re-sampling detection techniques described in the literature, but their performance has been often examined with a small dataset. Besides, performance and robustness have been tested under different conditions, so it is difficult to evaluate and compare them. In this paper, we analyze the performance of some selected re-sampling detection techniques by using a common testing framework and a large dataset. We also employ several kinds of image post-processing to defeat the detectors in order to evaluate their robustness and security. We show that the tested techniques obtain the best results when detecting up-sampled images. Unfortunately, most techniques are not secure and they can be defeated on different levels by applying post-processing operations to the forged images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sencar, H.T., Memon, N.: Overview of State-of-the-Art in Digital Image Forensics. In: Proc. WSPC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farid, H.: Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 26, 16–25 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahdian, B., Saic, S.: A bibliography on blind methods for identifying image forgery. Signal Processing: Image Communication 25, 389–399 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Popescu, A., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kirchner, M.: Fast and reliable resampling detection by spectral analysis of fixed linear predictor residue. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security, MM&Sec 2008, vol. 11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirchner, M., Gloe, T.: On resampling detection in re-compressed images. In: WIFS, pp.21-25 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prasad, S.: On resampling detection and its application to detect image tampering. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, IIS Bangalore, India. 1325-1328 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher, A.C.: Detection of Linear and Cubic Interpolation in JPEG Compressed Images. In: The 2nd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV 2005), pp. 65-72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahdian, B., Saic, S.: Blind Authentication Using Periodic Properties of Interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3, 529–538 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirchner, M., Boehme, R.: Hiding Traces of Resampling in Digital Images. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3, 582–592 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stamm, M., Tjoa, S., Lin, S., Liu, J.: Anti-Forensics of JPEG Compression. In: ICASSP (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stamm, M., Tjoa, S., Lin, S., Liu, K.J.R.: Undetectable image tampering through JPEG compression. In: ICIP 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Uccheddu, F., Rosa, A.D., Piva, A., Barni, M.: Detection of resampled images: performance analysis and practical challenges. In: EURASIP, pp. 1675–1679 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. http://zoi.utia.cas.cz/files/rsmp_core.txt

  15. Dempster, A., Laird, N., Rubin, D.: Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39, 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nataraj, L., Sarkar, A., Manjunath, B.S.: Improving re-sampling detection by adding noise. Computer. 75410I-75410I-11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaefer, G.: UCID: an uncompressed color image database. In: Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 472–480 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirchner, M., Fridrich, J.: On detection of median filtering in digital images. Computer. 754110-754110-12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, H.C., Katzenbeisser, S. (2012). Performance and Robustness Analysis for Some Re-sampling Detection Techniques in Digital Images. In: Shi, Y.Q., Kim, HJ., Perez-Gonzalez, F. (eds) Digital Forensics and Watermarking. IWDW 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32205-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32205-1_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32204-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32205-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics