Skip to main content

Analysis of Diversity Assurance Methods for Combined Classifiers

  • Conference paper
Image Processing and Communications Challenges 4

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 184))

Summary

Assuring diversity of classifiers in an ensemble plays a crucial role in the multiple classifier system design. The paper presents a comparative study of selected methods which can assure the diversity by manipulating the individual classifier inputs i.e., they train learner using subspaces of a feature set or they try to exploit local competencies of individual classifier for a given subset of feature space. This work is a starting point for developing new methods of diversity assurance embedded in a multiple classifier system design. All methods had been evaluated on the basis of computer experiments which were carried out on benchmark datasets. On the basis of received results conclusions about the usefulness of examined methods for certain types of problems were drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpaydin, E.: Combined 5 x 2 cv f test for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 11(8), 1885–1892 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordella, L.P., Foggia, P., Sansone, C., Tortorella, F., Vento, M.: A Cascaded Multiple Expert System for Verification. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, pp. 330–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank, A., Asuncion, A.: UCI machine learning repository (2010), http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  5. Giacinto, G.: Design multiple classifier systems. Technical Report PhD thesis, Universita Degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giacinto, G., Roli, F., Fumera, G.: Design of effective multiple classifier systems by clustering of classifiers. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 160–163 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho, K.T.: The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 832–844 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes, G., Donkin, A., Witten, I.H.: Weka: A machine learning workbench. In: Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand Conference on Intelligent Information Systems, pp. 357–361 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hornik, K., Buchta, C., Zeileis, A.: Open-source machine learning: R meets weka. Computational Statistics 24(2), 225–232 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackowski, K., Wozniak, M.: Algorithm of designing compound recognition system on the basis of combining classifiers with simultaneous splitting feature space into competence areas. Pattern Analysis and Applications 12(4), 415–425 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 264–323 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, A.K., Duin, R.P.W., Mao, J.: Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(1), 4–37 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krawczyk, B.: Classifier Committee Based on Feature Selection Method for Obstructive Nephropathy Diagnosis. In: Katarzyniak, R., Chiu, T.-F., Hong, C.-F., Nguyen, N.T. (eds.) Semantic Methods for Knowledge Management and Communication. SCI, vol. 381, pp. 115–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuncheva, L.I.: Clustering-and-selection model for classifier combination. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 185–188 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Partridge, D., Krzanowski, W.: Software diversity: practical statistics for its measurement and exploitation. Information and Software Technology 39(10), 707–717 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rastrigin, L.A., Erenstein, R.H.: Method of Collective Recognition. Energoizdat, Moscow (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodríguez, J.J., Kuncheva, L.I., Alonso, C.J.: Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28(10), 1619–1630 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruta, D., Gabrys, B.: Classifier selection for majority voting. Information Fusion 6(1), 63–81 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolpert, D.H.: The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. In: Proc. 6th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, pp. 25–42 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, L., Liu, H.: Feature selection for high-dimensional data: A fast correlation-based filter solution. In: Proceedings of Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 2, pp. 856–863 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bartosz Krawczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krawczyk, B., Woźniak, M. (2013). Analysis of Diversity Assurance Methods for Combined Classifiers. In: Choraś, R. (eds) Image Processing and Communications Challenges 4. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32384-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32384-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32383-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32384-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics