Skip to main content

Weighted Feature Similarity – A Nonlinear Combination of Gradient and Phase Congruency for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment

  • Conference paper
Image Processing and Communications Challenges 4

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 184))

  • 2358 Accesses

Summary

In the paper the modified Feature Similarity metric has been discussed which is based on the nonlinear combination of two elements being the basics of the recently developed Feature Similarity metric for full-reference image quality assessment. Nevertheless, the influence of the gradient magnitude and phase congruency, used as two main elements of the metric, on the perceived quality is not necessarily equal. For this reason some experiments have been conducted in order to propose the weighting coefficients, applied as the local exponents, increasing the rank order correlation coefficients with subjective quality evaluations. The verification of the obtained results has been conducted using 5 ”state-of-the-art” benchmark databases and the obtained weighted FSIM metric’s performance results are better for all of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Okarma, K.: Colour Image Quality Assessment Using Structural Similarity Index and Singular Value Decomposition. In: Bolc, L., Kulikowski, J.L., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2008. LNCS, vol. 5337, pp. 55–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Okarma, K.: Colour Image Quality Assessment Using the Combined Full-Reference Metric. In: Burduk, R., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M., Żołnierek, A., et al. (eds.) Computer Recognition Systems 4. AISC, vol. 95, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Forczmański, P., Okarma, K.: Application of the central weighted Structural Similarity index for the estimation of the face recognition accuracy. Annales UMCS - Informatica 9(1), 153–163 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.: A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Proc. Letters 9(3), 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E.: Image quality assessment: From error measurement to Structural Similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E., Bovik, A.: Multi-Scale Structural Similarity for image quality assessment. In: Proc. 37th IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, G.H., Yang, C.L., Xie, S.L.: Gradient-based structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, pp. 2929–2932 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sampat, M., Wang, Z., Gupta, S., Bovik, A., Markey, M.: Complex Wavelet Structural Similarity: A new image similarity index. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 18(11), 2385–2401 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, C., Bovik, A.: Three-component weighted structural similarity index. In: Proceedings of SPIE - Image Quality and System Performance VI, 72420Q (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X.: RFSIM: A feature based image quality assessment metric using Riesz transforms. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, pp. 321–324 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Zhang, D.: FSIM: A Feature Similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Shnayderman, A., Gusev, A., Eskicioglu, A.: An SVD-based gray-scale image quality measure for local and global assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 15(2), 422–429 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmoudi-Aznaveh, A., Mansouri, A., Torkamani-Azar, F., Eslami, M.: Image quality measurement besides distortion type classifying. Optical Review 16(1), 30–34 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mansouri, A., Mahmoudi-Aznaveh, A., Torkamani-Azar, F., Jahanshahi, J.: Image quality assessment using the Singular Value Decomposition theorem. Optical Review 16(2), 49–53 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, R., Cui, Y., Yuan, Y.: Image quality assessment using full-parameter Singular Value Decomposition. Optical Engineering 50(5), 057005 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, F., Li, J., Chen, G., Man, J.: Assessment of color video quality with Singular Value Decomposition of complex matrix. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Information Assurance and Security, pp. 103–106 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Narwaria, M., Lin, W.: Objective image quality assessment with Singular Value Decomposition. In: Proc. 5th Int. Workshop Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Narwaria, M., Lin, W.: SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 42(2), 347–364 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: TID2008 - a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics 10, 30–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larson, E., Chandler, D.: Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of Electronic Imaging 19(1), 011006 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheikh, H., Wang, Z., Cormack, L., Bovik, A.: LIVE image quality assessment database release 2 (2005), http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality

  22. Engelke, U., Zepernick, H., Kusuma, T.: Subjective quality assessment for wireless image communication: The Wireless Imaging Quality database. In: Proc. 5th Int. Workshop Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Le Callet, P., Autrusseau, F.: Subjective quality assessment IRCCyN/IVC database (2005), http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/ivcdb/

  24. Okarma, K.: Combined Full-Reference Image Quality Metric Linearly Correlated with Subjective Assessment. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6113, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Tourancheau, S., Autrusseau, F., Sazzad, Z., Horita, Y.: Impact of subjective dataset on the performance of image quality metrics. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, pp. 365–368 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, Z., Laganiére, R.: Phase congruence measurement for image similarity assessment. Pattern Recognition Letters 28(1), 166–172 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Okarma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Okarma, K. (2013). Weighted Feature Similarity – A Nonlinear Combination of Gradient and Phase Congruency for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment. In: Choraś, R. (eds) Image Processing and Communications Challenges 4. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32384-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32384-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32383-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32384-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics