Skip to main content

Inter-organizational Reference Models – May Inter-organizational Systems Profit from Reference Modeling?

  • Chapter
Business System Management and Engineering

Abstract

Inter-organizational systems span from business models over business process models to their execution on top of a service-oriented architecture. In our project BSopt we have developed an integrated model-driven approach that addresses the different layers and builds up-on well-estabilshed languages on each of these layers. When applying our integrated methodology we recognized that models for the same business case are similar, but still varying for different business partner networks. Accordingly, a systematic approach to derive a model from another model, i.e., from a reference model, is needed. Significant achievements have been made by the reference modeling community in finding ways to leverage the potentials of model reuse in business process modeling. In this paper we outline the potentials of adapting design techniques known from reference modeling to the specific needs of inter-organizational system develpment even if we do not provide a solution yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., Werthner, H., Zapletal, M.: Inter-Organizational Systems: From Business Values over Business Processes to Deployment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, pp. 294–299. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Designing and evaluating e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems - Intelligent e-Business 16, 11–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordijn, J.: E-business Value Modelling using the E3-Value Ontology. In: Curry, W. (ed.) Value Creation Form e-Business Models, pp. 98–127. Elsevier (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA Accounting Model: A Generalized Framework for Accounting Systems in a Shared Data Environment. The Accounting Review 57(3) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: An Accounting Object Infrastructure for Knowledge-Based Enterprise Models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(4), 89–94 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. UN/CEFACT: UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology (UMM), UMM Meta Model - FoundationModule. Implementation Verification Draft, Version 2.0 (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huemer, C., Liegl, P., Schuster, R., Zapletal, M.: B2B Services: Worksheet-Driven Development of Modeling Artifacts and Code. The Computer Journal 52(8), 1006–1026 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UN/CEFACT: Core Components Technical Specification, Version 3.0 (November 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huemer, C., Liegl, P.: A uml profile for core components and their transformation to xsd. In: Workshop Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE Data Engineering), pp. 298–306 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. OASIS: Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version, Version 2.0 (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Perspectives on Reference Modeling. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 1–20. Idea (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, O.: Understanding the Term Reference Model in Information Systems Research: History, Literature Analysis and Explanation. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 484–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. vom Brocke, J.: Design Principles for Reference Modeling - Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialisation, Instantiation, and Analogy. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 47–76. Idea (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, T.C.: Reusability in Programming: A Survey of the State of the Art. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 10(5), 488–494 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Slater, P.: Output from generic packages. Ada Lett. XV(3), 76–79 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coad, P., Yourdon, E.: Object Oriented Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, B.J.: Planning the Software Industrial Revolution. IEEE Software 7(6), 25–33 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heineman, G.T., Councill, W.T.: Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Professional (June 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Professional (December 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Later printing edn. Center for Environmental Structure Series. Oxford University Press (August 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley Professional (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hay, D.C.: Data Model Patterns: Conventions of Thought. Dorset House Publishing Co., Inc. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coad, P., North, D., Mayfield, M.: Object Models: strategies, patterns and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.0 (January 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karagiannis, D., Fill, H.G., Höfferer, P., Nemetz, M.: Metamodeling: Some Application Areas in Information Systems. In: Kaschek, R., Kop, C., Steinberger, C., Fliedl, G. (eds.) UNISCON 2008. LNBIP, vol. 5, pp. 175–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Dreiling, A., Knackstedt, R., Kuropka, D.: Configurative Process Modeling - Outlining an Approach to Increased Business Process Model Usability. In: 2004 Information Resources Management Association Conference, pp. 615–619 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Classification of Reference Models: A Methodology and its Application. Information Systems and E-Business Management 1(1), 35–53 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheer, A.-W., Nüttgens, M.: ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 376–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Becker, J., Schütte, R.: Retail Information Systems - Handelsinformationssysteme, 2nd edn. Verlag Moderne Industrie (2004) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huschens, J., Rumpold-Preining, M.: IBM Insurance Application Architecture (IAA). In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 669–692. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kittlaus, H.B., Krahl, D.: The SIZ Banking Data Model. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 723–743. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scheer, A.W.: Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Meinhardt, S., Popp, K.: Configuring Business Application Systems. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 705–721. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mendling, J.: On the Syntax of Reference Model Configuration – Transforming the C-EPC into Lawful EPC Models. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 497–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Karhinen, A., Ran, A., Tallgren, T.: Configuring Designs for Reuse. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR 1997), pp. 199–208. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Peterson, A.S.: Coming to Terms with Software Reuse Terminology: A Model-based Approach. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 16(2), 45–51 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. vom Brocke, J.: Reference Modeling, Towards Collaborative Arrangements of Design Processes. Logos Berlin (2003) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, P.P.S.: The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). Technical Report 89, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany (January 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hofreiter, B., vom Brocke, J.: On the Contribution of Reference Modeling to e-Business Standardization – How to Apply Design Techniques of Reference Modeling to UN/CEFACT’s Modeling Methodology. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 671–682. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A.: Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weill, P., Vitale, M.: Place to Space: Migrating to e-Business Models. Mcgraw-Hill (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business. In: Proceedings of the 15th Bled E-Commerce Conference - Constructing the e-Economy, pp. 1–12 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Object Management Group (OMG): BPMN Specification, Version 2.0 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mayer, R., Menzel, C., Painter, M., de Witte, P., Blinn, T., Perakath, B.: Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report. Technical report (September 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  49. UN/CEFACT: UN/CEFACT - ebXML Business Process Specification Schema, Version 1.11 (November 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  50. RosettaNet: RosettaNet Implementation Framework: Core Specification, Version 02.00.01 (December 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Scheer, A.W.: ARIS - Business Process Modeling. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  52. List, B., Korherr, B.: A UML 2 Profile for Business Process Modelling. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 85–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Korherr, B., List, B.: An Evaluation of Conceptual Business Process Modelling Languages. In: 21st ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2006), pp. 1532–1539. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Winograd, T.: A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. In: CSCW 1986: Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 203–220. ACM (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dietz, J.L.: The deep structure of business processes. Commun. ACM 49(5), 58–64 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. OASIS, UN/CEFACT: ebXML - Technical Architecture Specification, Version 1.4 (February 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Klas, W.: ebXML: Status, Research Issues, and Obstacles. In: 12th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE 2002), pp. 7–16. IEEE CS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fensel, D., Ding, Y., Omelayenko, B., Schulten, E., Botquin, G., Brown, M., Flett, A.: Product Data Integration in B2B E-Commerce. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 16(4), 54–59 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Guo, J.: Inter-Enterprise Business Document Exchange. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2006), pp. 427–437. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  60. UN/CEFACT: UML Profile for Core Components Technical Specification 3.0. Draft for Version 3.0 (January 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  61. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  62. Andrew, P., Conard, J., Woodgate, S., Flanders, J., Hatoun, G., Hilerio, I., Indurkar, P., Pilarinos, D., Willis, J.: Presenting Windows Workflow Foundation, 1st edn. Sams (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features - Enhancing Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems. Data Knowl. Eng. 66(3), 438–466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Holeman, K.: Contracts - Simplifying the next version of UBL (January 2006), A mail to the UBL developers list, http://markmail.org/message/o3ra6fffiw6mu7jw

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofreiter, B., Huemer, C., Kappel, G., Mayrhofer, D., vom Brocke, J. (2012). Inter-organizational Reference Models – May Inter-organizational Systems Profit from Reference Modeling?. In: Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., Maciaszek, L.A., Missikoff, M., Parkin, M. (eds) Business System Management and Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7350. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32439-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32439-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32438-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32439-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics