Abstract
Process Performance Indicators (PPIs) are a key asset for the measurement of the achievement of strategic and operational goals in process–oriented organisations. Ideally, the definition of PPIs should not only be unambiguous, complete, and understandable to non–technical stakeholders, but also traceable to business processes and verifiable by means of automated analysis. In practice, PPIs are defined either informally in natural language, with its well–known problems, or at a very low level, or too formally, becoming thus hardly understandable to managers and users. In order to solve this problem, in this paper, a novel approach to improve the definition of PPIs using templates and ontology–based linguistic patterns is proposed. Its main benefits are that it is easy to learn, promotes reuse, reduces ambiguities and missing information, is understandable to all stakeholders and maintains traceability with the process model. Furthermore, since it relies on a formal ontology based on Description Logics, it is possible to perform automated analysis and infer knowledge regarding the relationships between PPI definitions and other process elements.
This work has been partially supported by the European Commission (FEDER), Spanish Government under the CICYT project SETI (TIN2009–07366); and projects THEOS (TIC–5906) and ISABEL (P07–TIC–2533) funded by the Andalusian local Government.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shahin, A., Mahbod, M.A.: Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56, 226–240 (2007)
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D.: Management by Measurement: Designing Key Indicators and Performance Measurement Systems. Springer (2007)
del-Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Defining Process Performance Indicators: An Ontological Approach. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T.S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6426, pp. 555–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
del Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: PPI definition and automated design-time analysis. Technical report, Applied Software Engineering Research Group (2012)
Durán, A., Bernárdez, B., Ruiz-Cortés, A., Toro, M.: A Requirements Elicitation Approach based in Templates and Patterns. In: Proc. Workshop de Engenharia de Requisitos (WER 1999), Buenos Aires, Argentina (1999)
Durán, A., Ruiz-Cortés, A., Corchuelo, R., Toro, M.: Supporting Requirements Verification using XSLT. In: Proc. IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 165–172 (2002)
Ruiz-Cortés, A., Martín-Díaz, O., Durán, A., Toro, M.: Improving the automatic procurement of web services using constraint programming. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 14(4), 439–468 (2005)
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (January 2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
del-Río-Ortega, A., Resinas Arias de Reyna, M., Durán Toro, A., Ruiz-Cortés, A. (2012). Defining Process Performance Indicators by Using Templates and Patterns. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32884-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32885-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)