Skip to main content

On Definability and Redundancy in \(\cal{EL}\)–TBoxes

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7497))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 646 Accesses

Abstract

We describe a technical solution for solving the following entailment problem in the Description Logic \(\cal{EL}\): \(({\cal T}\setminus U) \cup f^*({\cal T}\setminus U) \models C_1\sqsubseteq C_2\), where \({\cal T}\) is a TBox, C 1,C 2 are concepts, U is a subset of axioms of \({\cal T}\), and f * is a renaming function which gives a copy of TBox with some signature symbols injectively renamed. We introduce an enriched model structure for \(\cal{EL}\) TBoxes: once built for a given TBox \({\cal T}\), it allows for checking the entailment efficiently for different choices of C 1,C 2, U, and f *. This problem is concerned with computing explicit definitions of concepts wrt a signature and is an important part of the recently proposed algorithms for ontology decomposition.

This work was funded by the grant of the President of Russian Federation (Grant No. MK-2037.2011.9), the Russian Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 15/10), and the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Integration Project No. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brandt, S.: Polynomial Time Reasoning in a Description Logic with Existential Restrictions, GCI Axioms, and—What Else? In: Proc. Sixteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Ponomaryov, D., Wolter, F.: Decomposing description logic ontologies. In: Proc. Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Formal Properties of Modularisation. In: Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S., Stuckenschmidt, H. (eds.) Ontology Modularisation. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grimm, S., Wissmann, J.: Elimination of Redundancy in Ontologies. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 260–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Seylan, I., Franconi, E., de Bruijn, J.: Effective query rewriting with ontologies over dboxes. In: Proc. Twenty-first International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ponomaryov, D., Vlasov, D. (2012). On Definability and Redundancy in \(\cal{EL}\)–TBoxes. In: Krötzsch, M., Straccia, U. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7497. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33202-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33203-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics