Skip to main content

PINGO: Peer Instruction for Very Large Groups

  • Conference paper
21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (EC-TEL 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7563))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this research, we introduce a new web-based solution that enables the transfer of the widely established Peer Instruction method to lectures with far more than 100 participants. The proposed solution avoids several existing flaws that hinder the widespread adoption of PI in lectures with larger groups. We test our new solution in a series of lectures with more than 500 participants and evaluate our prototype using the technology acceptance model. The evaluation results as well as qualitative feedback of course participants indicate that our new solution is a useful artifact to transfer the PI method to large groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chase, J.D., Okie, E.G.: Combining cooperative learning and peer instruction in introductory computer science. SIGCSE Bulletin 32(1), 372–376 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortright, R.N., Collins, H.L., DiCarlo, S.E.: Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems. Advances in Physiology Education 29, 107–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crouch, C.H.: Peer instruction: An interactive approach for large classes. Optics & Photonics News 9(9), 37–41 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crouch, C.H., Mazur, E.: Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69, 970–977 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagen, A.P., Crouch, C.H., Mazur, E.: Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. Physics Teacher, 206–209 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fels, G.: Die Publikumsfrage in der Chemievorlesung. Chemkon 16, 197–201 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giuliodori, M.J., Lujan, H.L., DiCarlo, S.E.: Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problemsolving questions. Advances in Physiology Education 30, 168–173 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education 53(3), 819–827 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25(2), 235–249 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koufaris, M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research 13(2), 205–223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lantz, M.E.: The use of ’clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior 26(4), 556–561 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MacArthur, J.R., Jones, L.L.: A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9(3), 187–195 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazur, E.: Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice Hall (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moss, K., Crowley, M.: Effective learning in science: The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences. Computers & Education 56(1), 36–43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pilzer, S.: Peer instruction in physics and mathematics. Primus 11(2), 185–192 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.K., Guild, N., Su, T.T.: Why peer discussion improves student performance on inclass concept questions. Science 323, 122–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Szajna, B.: Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42(1), 85–92 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reinhardt, W. et al. (2012). PINGO: Peer Instruction for Very Large Groups. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds) 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7563. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33263-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics