Skip to main content

Some Definitorial Suggestions for Parameterized Proof Complexity

  • Conference paper
Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7535))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce a (new) notion of parameterized proof system. For parameterized versions of standard proof systems such as Extended Frege and Substitution Frege we compare their complexity with respect to parameterized simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beyersdorff, O., Galesi, N., Lauria, M., Razborov, A.: Parameterized Bounded-Depth Frege Is Not Optimal. In: Aceto, L., Henzinger, M., Sgall, J. (eds.) ICALP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6755, pp. 630–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Buss, S.: Some remarks on the lengths of propositional proofs. Archive for Mathematical Logic 34, 377–394 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Buss, S.: Polynomial size proofs of the propositional pigeon principle. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52, 916–927 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, S., Nguyen, P.: Logical Foundations of Proof Complexity. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, S., Reckhow, R.: The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 44, 36–50 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dantchev, S.S., Martin, B., Szeider, S.: Parameterized proof complexity. Computational Complexity 20(1), 51–85 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Parameterized Complexity. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flum, J., Grohe, M.: Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fortnow, L., Santhanam, R.: Infeasibility of instance compression and succinct PCPs for NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 77(1), 91–106 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Krajíček, J.: On the number of steps in proofs. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41, 153–178 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Krajíček, J.: Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krajíček, J., Pudlák, P.: Propositional proof systems, the consistency of first order theories and the complexity of computations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 54, 1063–1088 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Flum, J., Müller, M. (2012). Some Definitorial Suggestions for Parameterized Proof Complexity. In: Thilikos, D.M., Woeginger, G.J. (eds) Parameterized and Exact Computation. IPEC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7535. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33293-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33293-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33292-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33293-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics