Skip to main content

A Systematic Elaboration of Safety Requirements in the Avionic Domain

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7613))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2182 Accesses

Abstract

Avionic safety standards such as ARP4754A, DO-178B, and DO-254 specifying the development, validation and verification processes do not provide an unambiguous guideline for system developers, refining ARP4754A system requirements down to DO-178B or DO-254 specific items. Consequently, tracing the high-level system safety requirements down to safety item requirements of the individual system components is extremely difficult and error-prone. Today, the refinement of system safety requirements and their allocation to items, that shall realize them, is done mostly ad-hoc. This utilized ad-hoc approach is due to a lack of systematic elaboration methodologies. In this paper we advocate an approach that explicitly specifies the transition from abstract system requirements to concrete item requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, S., Lempia, D.: Requirements Engineering Management Findings Report. Technical Report (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ARP4754A. Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems. SAE International (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. DO-178B. Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification. RTCA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DO-254. Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware. RTCA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson, M., Zave, P.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson, M.: The meaning of requirements. Annals of Software Engineering 3 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson, M.: The world and the machine. In: Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference of Software Engineering (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Uncontrolled decompression: Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontrolled_decompression

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kondeva, A., Wassmuth, M., Mitschke, A. (2012). A Systematic Elaboration of Safety Requirements in the Avionic Domain. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33674-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33675-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics