Skip to main content

The Comparative Analysis of the Innovation Level for the Entrepreneurial Education

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 195))

  • 1971 Accesses

Abstract

The paper makes a comparative analysis, regarding the offer of facilitators for entrepreneurship education in a region of Central and Eastern Europe (Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Serbia), using a model that is starting from Kano’s model of satisfaction, the five levels of inventiveness proposed by Altshuller, and the activities and product/services degree of ideality, a methodology for the assessment of the innovation level, in general, and of the entrepreneurship education in particular. In order to sustain the practicability of the proposed methodology, the research includes a case study about innovation level for the activities of the main facilitators for entrepreneurship education in Romania, and a comparative analysis between Romania and Bulgaria, Hungary and Serbia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuller, G.: The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical Innovation Ctr, Worcester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heinonen, J., Poikkijoki, S.A.: An entrepreneurial-directed approach to entrepreneurship education: mission impossible. Journal of Management Development 25(1), 80–94 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hytti, U., Stenholm, P., Heinonen, J.: Perceived learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training 52(8/9), 587–606 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, B.R.: Toward a Multidimensional Model of Entrepreneurship: The case of Achievement Motivation and the Entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice (spring), 39–54 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kano, N.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 39–48 (April 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelley, D.J., et al.: GEM 2011 Global Report. Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuratko, D.F., Hodgetts, R.M.: Entrepreneurship: theory, process, practice. Thomson South – Western, Manson-Ohio (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlov, D., Tamasila, M.: Methodological approach for questionnaires development in Bulgarian-Romanian scientific project. In: Annual Scientific Conference of Ruse University, vol. 50, book 5.2, pp. 34–41 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rae, D.: Universities and enterprise education: responding to the challenges of the new era. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 7(4), 591–606 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruset, V., et al.: Training opportunities in Central and Eastern Europe – Summary results of the HELP training needs analysis. Publishing House Politehnica, Timisoara (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tamasila, M., Foltean, F.S.: The analysis of the innovation level for the entrepreneurial education in the west region of Romania. In: 8th International Conference MTC-Management of Technological Changes, Alexandroupolis, vol. 2, pp. 445–448 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Todorova, M.S., Ruskova, S., Gedinach, V., Buciuman, C., Taucean, I.: Willingness and readiness of students to become entrepreneurs. In: Annual Scientific Conference of Rousse University, vol. 50, book 5.1, pp. 150–155 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matei Tămăşilă .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tămăşilă, M., Tăucean, I.M. (2013). The Comparative Analysis of the Innovation Level for the Entrepreneurial Education. In: Balas, V., Fodor, J., Várkonyi-Kóczy, A., Dombi, J., Jain, L. (eds) Soft Computing Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33941-7_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33941-7_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33941-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics