Skip to main content

Influence Diagram for Selection of Pedagogical Strategies in a Multi-Agent System Learning

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2012 (IBERAMIA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7637))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An Influence Diagram is a simple visual representation of a decision problem that provides an intuitive way to identify and display the essential elements, including decisions, uncertainties, and objectives, and on how they influence each other. This paper discusses its use in the selection of pedagogical strategies in a multi-agent learning system for the health care practitioners: SimDeCS (Simulation for Decision Making in the Health Care Service). A clinical case is also presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clemen, R.T.: Making Hard Decisions – An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shachter, R.D.: Evaluating Influence Diagrams. Operations Research 34(6), 871–882 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kendrick, D.C., Bu, D., Pan, E., Middleton, B.: Crossing the Evidence Chasm – Building Evidence Bridges from Process Changes to Clinical Outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(3), 329–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gómes, M., Bielza, C., Pozo, J.A.F., Ríos-Insua, S.: A Graphical Decision–Theoretic Model for Neonatal Jaundice. Medical Decision Making 27(3), 250–265 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, R.C., Ekaette, E., Kelly, K.L., Craighead, P., Newcomb, C., Dunscombe, P.: Implications of Cancer Staging Uncertainties in Radiation Therapy Decisions. Medical Decision Making 26(3), 226–238 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun, L., Zeng, Y., Xiang, Y.: An Influence Diagram Approach for Multiagent Time-Critical Dynamic Decision Modeling. In: Zhang, B.-T., Orgun, M.A. (eds.) PRICAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6230, pp. 674–680. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng, Y., Xiang, Y.: Time-Critical Decision Making in Interactive Dynamic Influence Diagram. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT 2010), pp. 149–156. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, H., Zhang, C., Wan, Y.: Research on Information Engineering Surveillance Risk Evaluation Based on Probabilistic Influence Diagram. In: 2nd IEEE Intl. Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME 2010), pp. 362–366. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ziv, A., Ben-David, S., Ziv, M.: Simulation Based Medical Education – An Opportunity to Learn from Errors. Medical Teacher 27(3), 193–199 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kincaid, J.P., Hamilton, R., Tarr, R.W., Sangani, H.: Simulation in Education and Training. In: Obaidat, M.S., Papadimitriou, G.I. (eds.) Applied System Simulation – Theory and Applications, pp. 437–456. Kluwer Academic Publlishers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scalese, R.J., Obeso, V.T.S., Issenberg, B.: Simulation Technology for Skills Training and Competency Assessment in Medical Education. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(Suppl. 1), 46–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanwick, T.: Understanding Medical Education – Evidence, Theory and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein, R.: Assessment in Medical Education. New England Journal of Medicine 356(4), 387–396 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ker, J., Bradley, P.: Simulation in Medical Education. In: Swanwick, T. (ed.) Understanding Medical Education – Evidence, Theory and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, 2nd edn., vol. 1, p. 552. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gluz, J., Vicari, R., Flores, C., Seixas, L.: Formal Analysis of a Probabilistic Knowledge Communication Framework. In: Sichman, J.S., Coelho, H., Rezende, S.O. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2006 and SBIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4140, pp. 138–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Flores, C., Seixas, L., Gluz, J., Vicari, R.: A Model of Pedagogical Negotiation. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds.) EPIA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3808, pp. 488–499. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. An, N., Liu, J., Bai, Y.: Fuzzy Influence Diagrams - An Approach to Customer Satisfaction Measurement. In: Lei, J. (ed.) 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007), pp. 493–497. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bez, M.R., Flores, C.D., Fonseca, J.M.L., Maroni, V., Barros, P.R., Vicari, R.M. (2012). Influence Diagram for Selection of Pedagogical Strategies in a Multi-Agent System Learning. In: Pavón, J., Duque-Méndez, N.D., Fuentes-Fernández, R. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2012. IBERAMIA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7637. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34654-5_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34654-5_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34653-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34654-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics