Abstract
Many software development tools (e.g., profilers, debuggers, testing tools) and frameworks (e.g., aspect weavers) are based on bytecode instrumentation techniques. While there are many low-level bytecode manipulation libraries that support the development of such tools and frameworks, they typically provide only low-level abstractions and require detailed knowledge of the Java Virtual Machine. In addition, they often lack the necessary infrastructure for load-time instrumentation with complete bytecode coverage to ensure that each method with a bytecode representation gets instrumented. In this paper we give an introduction to DiSL, a domain-specific aspect language and framework for bytecode instrumentation that reconciles high expressiveness of the language, high level of abstraction, and efficiency of the generated code. We illustrate the strengths of DiSL with a concrete analysis as a case study. The DiSL framework is open-source and has been successfully used in several research projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Binder, W., Ansaloni, D., Villazón, A., Moret, P.: Flexible and efficient profiling with aspect-oriented programming. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 23(15), 1749–1773 (2011)
Chiba, S., Nishizawa, M.: An Easy-to-Use Toolkit for Efficient Java Bytecode Translators. In: Pfenning, F., Macko, M. (eds.) GPCE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2830, pp. 364–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Chiba, S.: Load-Time Structural Reflection in Java. In: Bertino, E. (ed.) ECOOP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1850, pp. 313–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Menhdhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J.M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-Oriented Programming. In: Aksit, M., Auletta, V. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Marek, L., Villazón, A., Zheng, Y., Ansaloni, D., Binder, W., Qi, Z.: DiSL: a domain-specific language for bytecode instrumentation. In: AOSD 2012: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development, pp. 239–250 (2012)
Moret, P., Binder, W., Tanter, É.: Polymorphic bytecode instrumentation. In: AOSD 2011: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development, pp. 129–140 (2011)
Pearce, D.J., Webster, M., Berry, R., Kelly, P.H.J.: Profiling with AspectJ. Software: Practice and Experience 37(7), 747–777 (2007)
Sewe, A., Mezini, M., Sarimbekov, A., Ansaloni, D., Binder, W., Ricci, N., Guyer, S.Z.: new Scala() instanceof Java: A comparison of the memory behaviour of Java and Scala programs. In: ISMM 2012: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Memory Management. pp. 97–108 (2012)
Vallée-Rai, R., Gagnon, E., Hendren, L., Lam, P., Pominville, P., Sundaresan, V.: Optimizing Java Bytecode Using the Soot Framework: Is It Feasible? In: Watt, D.A. (ed.) CC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1781, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Zheng, Y., Ansaloni, D., Marek, L., Sewe, A., Binder, W., Villazón, A., Tuma, P., Qi, Z., Mezini, M.: Turbo DiSL: Partial Evaluation for High-Level Bytecode Instrumentation. In: Furia, C.A., Nanz, S. (eds.) TOOLS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7304, pp. 353–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marek, L. et al. (2012). Java Bytecode Instrumentation Made Easy: The DiSL Framework for Dynamic Program Analysis. In: Jhala, R., Igarashi, A. (eds) Programming Languages and Systems. APLAS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7705. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35182-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35182-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35181-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35182-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)