Skip to main content

Convergence of Best-Response Dynamics in Games with Conflicting Congestion Effects

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7695))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the model of resource allocation games with conflicting congestion effects introduced by Feldman and Tamir (2012). In this model, an agent’s cost consists of its resource’s load (which increases with congestion) and its share in the resource’s activation cost (which decreases with congestion). The current work studies the convergence rate of best-response dynamics (BRD) in the case of homogeneous agents. Even within this simple setting, interesting phenomena arise. We show that, in contrast to standard congestion games with identical jobs and resources, the convergence rate of BRD under conflicting congestion effects might be super-linear in the number of jobs. Nevertheless, a specific form of BRD is proposed, which is guaranteed to converge in linear time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, H., Röglin, H., Vöcking, B.: On the impact of combinatorial structure on congestion games. In: FOCS 2006, pp. 613–622 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, É., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. In: FOCS 2004, pp. 295–304 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Epstein, A., Mirrokni, V.S., Skopalik, A.: Fast convergence to nearly optimal solutions in potential games. In: ACMEC 2008, pp. 264–273 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, B., Gürel, S.: Efficiency analysis of load balancing games with and without activation costs. Journal of Scheduling 15(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chien, S., Sinclair, A.: Convergence to approximate Nash equilibria in congestion games. In: SODA 2007, pp. 169–178 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. Games and Economic Behavior 67(1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Even-Dar, E., Kesselman, A., Mansour, Y.: Convergence Time to Nash Equilibria. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 502–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C., Talwar, K.: The complexity of pure Nash equilibria. In: STOC 2004, pp. 604–612 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman, M., Tamir, T.: Conflicting congestion effects in resource allocation games. Operations Research 60(3), 529–540 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman, M., Tamir, T.: Conflicting congestion effects in resource allocation games. Full version, http://www.faculty.idc.ac.il/tami/Papers/BRDcoco.pdf

  11. Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The Structure and Complexity of Nash Equilibria for a Selfish Routing Game. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 123–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fotakis, D.: Congestion games with linearly independent paths: convergence time and price of anarchy. Theory Comput. Syst. 47(1), 113–136 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoefer, M., Skopalik, A.: Stability and Convergence in Selfish Scheduling with Altruistic Agents. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 616–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ieong, S., Mcgrew, R., Nudelman, E., Shoham, Y., Sun, Q.: Fast and Compact: A simple class of congestion games. In: AAAI 2005, pp. 489–494 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johari, R., Kumar, S.: Congestible services and network effects. In: EC 2010, pp. 93–94 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. Computer Science Review 3(2), 65–69 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior 14, 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Papadimitriou, C.: Algorithms, games, and the Internet. In: STOC 2001, pp. 749–753 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenthal, R.W.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65–67 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Syrgkanis, V.: The Complexity of Equilibria in Cost Sharing Games. In: Saberi, A. (ed.) WINE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6484, pp. 366–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feldman, M., Tamir, T. (2012). Convergence of Best-Response Dynamics in Games with Conflicting Congestion Effects. In: Goldberg, P.W. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7695. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35310-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35311-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics