Skip to main content

Surface Mining Signal Discrimination Using Landsat TM Sensor: An Empirical Approach

  • Conference paper
Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA 2012)

Abstract

In Chotanagpur plateau of Jharkhand State in India, mining is a prominent activity. Sample sites of three such ores, viz. Bauxite, Hematite and Uranium were taken up for the present study wherein the first two are extracted through surface mining, leaving their signatures on the earth’s surface, while the third one, extracted through underground mining process, leaves its trail in tailing-pond, after its beneficiation, because of the higher degree of its radioactive property (half-life of Uranium is around 4,500 million years [1]). The Study attempts to statistically discriminate mining signals that were picked up as DN (digital number) values of the first four spectral bands of TM (Thematic Mapper) sensor, displayed on the graphic screen as the additive colour composite, using three primary colours namely red, green and blue (RGB) as standard FCC (false colour composite) of Landsat satellite-image. The said discrimination were based on application of two independent statistical algorithm on these values, one being paired-sample Student’s t-Test (at 95% confidence level and 3°of freedom) through SPSS (ver. 19) software and the second, subsequently, ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test (at 95% confidence level), in order to further discriminate the signals based on parameters like spectral bands and nature of mineral being mined. According to the first algorithm Bauxite was found to be clearly discriminated, both from Uranium as well as Hematite, while Hematite could only be distinguished from Bauxite but not from Uranium. Performance of ANOVA test on the DN values discriminated the surface mining signals pertaining to these three different ores and it showed a high variance between the spectral bands both within the same ore group emphasising that different bands of the satellite sensors specifically identify features and also between the different ore groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nelkon, M., Parker, P.: Advanced level physics, 6th edn. Gulab Vazirani, New Delhi (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen, J.R.: Introductory digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pillai, R.N.S., Bhgavathi: Practical statistics. S. Chand and company, New Delhi (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Le, W., Sousa Wayne, P.: Distinguishing mangrove species with laboratory measurements of hyperspectral leaf reflectance. Int. J. of Remote Sensing 30(5), 1267–1281 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ihse, M.: Vegetation mapping and landscape changes. GIS-modelling and analysis of vegetation transitions, forest limits and expected future forest expansion. Norwegian J. of Geography 64(1), 76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, W., Wang, W.: ‘Landslide occurring probability decision based on remote sensing and quantification theory. In: The Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, vol. XXXVII, Part B8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hassan, E.A., Elmar, C.: Integration of remote sensing, GIS and terrestrial forest inventory in estimation of acacia senegal tree parameters. In: Reuter, R. (ed.) Remote Sensing for Science, Education and Natural and Cultural Heritage. EARSeL (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cho, M.A., Sobhan, I., Skidmore, A.K., de Leeuw, J.: Discriminating species using hyperspectral indices at leaf and canopy scales. In: The Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, vol. XXXVII, Part B7, pp. 369–376 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vaiphasa, C.: Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. Ph D thesis, ITC, The Neatrerlands (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lane, D.M.: Hyperstat online statistics textbook, http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/.2007

  11. Clark, M., Cooke, D.: A basic course in statistics. ELBS, Great Britain (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, S.C., Kapoor, V.K.: Fundamental of Mathematical Statistics. S. Chand and Sons, New Delhi (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das, N.C.: General computational relation between t and F-Ratios. J. of the Bihar Mathematical Soc. 18, 18–22 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. USGS 2009, Global Land Survey, 1975 TM 30m scene L4139045_04519890110 USGS, Sioux Falls, South Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  15. USGS 2009, Global Land Survey, 1975 TM 30m scene L4141044_04419890124 USGS, Sioux Falls, South Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  16. USGS 2009, Global Land Survey, 1975 TM 30m scene P141r045_5dt19891031_z44 USGS, Sioux Falls, South Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bancroft, G., O’Sullivan, G.: Maths and statistics for accounting and business studies, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reed III, J.F.: Contributions to two-sample statistics. J. Applied Statistics 32(1), 37–44 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W.: Remote sensing and image interpretation, pp. 579–584. John Willey and sons, Inc., New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vaiphasa, C., Ongsomwang, S., Vaiphasa, T.: Tropical mangrove species discrimination using hyperspectral data: A laboratory study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65, 371–379 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sharma, R.N.K., Bhatnagar, R., Singh, A.K. (2012). Surface Mining Signal Discrimination Using Landsat TM Sensor: An Empirical Approach. In: Hassanien, A.E., Salem, AB.M., Ramadan, R., Kim, Th. (eds) Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications. AMLTA 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 322. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35326-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35326-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35325-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35326-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics