Skip to main content

Combining Multiple K-Means Clusterings of Chemical Structures Using Cluster-Based Similarity Partitioning Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (AMLTA 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 322))

  • 3331 Accesses

Abstract

Consensus clustering methods have been used in many areas to improve the quality of individual clusterings. In this paper, graph-based consensus clustering, Cluster-based Similarity Partitioning Algorithm (CSPA), was used to improve the quality of chemical structures clustering by enhancing the ability to separate active from inactive molecules in each cluster and improve the robustness and stability of individual clusterings. The clustering was evaluated using Quality Partition Index (QPI) measure and the results were compared with the Ward’s clustering method. The chemical dataset MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR) database was used for experiments. The results obtained by combining multiple K-means clusterings showed that graph-based consensus clustering, CSPA, can improve the quality of individual chemical structure clusterings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson, G.W., Bush, J.A.: A method for the automatic classification of chemical structures. Information Storage and Retrieval 9, 561–568 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Downs, G.M., Barnard, J.M.: Clustering of Chemical Structures on the Basis of Two-Dimensional Similarity Measures. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 32, 644–649 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, R.D., Martin, Y.C.: Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36, 572–584 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vega-Pons, S., Ruiz-Schulcloper, J.: A survey of clustering ensemble algorithms. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 25(3), 337–372 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fred, A.L.N., Jain, A.K.: Combining multiple clustering using evidence accumulation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 835–850 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Topchy, A., Jain, A.K., Punch, W.: A mixture model of clustering ensembles. In: SIAM Int. Conf. Data Mining, pp. 379–390 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chu, C.-W., Holliday, J., Willett, P.: Combining multiple classifications of chemical structures using consensus clustering. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry (March 10, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salim, N., Holliday, J.D., Willett, P.: Combination of Fingerprint-Based Similarity Coefficients Using Data Fusion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 435–442 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Willet, P.: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Using Data Fusion. QSAR Comb. Sci. 25, 1143–1152 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, B., Mueller, C., Willett, P.: Combination Rules for Group Fusion in Similarity-Based Virtual Screening. Mol. Inf. 29, 533–541 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moffat, K., Gillet, V.J., Whittle, M., Bravi, G., Leach, A.R.: A Comparison of Field-Based Similarity Searching Methods: CatShape, FBSS, and ROCS. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48, 719–729 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdo, A., Chen, B., Mueller, C., Salim, N., Willett, P.: Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Using Bayesian Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 1012–1020 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdo, A., Salim, N.: New Fragment Weighting Scheme for the Bayesian Inference Network in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51, 25–32 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdo, A., Saeed, F., Hentabli, H., Ali, A., Salim, N., Ahmed, A.: Ligand expansion in ligand-based virtual screening using relevance feedback. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 26, 279–287 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sci Tegic Accelrys Inc. (September 1, 2012), http://www.http//accelrys.com/

  16. Strehl, A., Ghosh, J.: Cluster Ensembles - A Knowledge Reuse Framework for Combining Multiple Partitions. J. Machine Learning Research 3, 583–617 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J. Scient. Comput. 20, 359–392 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Varin, T., Saettel, N., Villain, J., Lesnard, A., Dauphin, F., Bureau, R., Rault, S.J.: Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 23, 593 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saeed, F., Salim, N., Abdo, A., Hentabli, H. (2012). Combining Multiple K-Means Clusterings of Chemical Structures Using Cluster-Based Similarity Partitioning Algorithm. In: Hassanien, A.E., Salem, AB.M., Ramadan, R., Kim, Th. (eds) Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications. AMLTA 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 322. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35326-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35326-0_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35325-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35326-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics