Abstract
The following review will provide a historical recap of the United States response to child pornography as it relates to the ever-evolving technological world. Specifically, a review of the child pornography laws, at the federal level, as well as the sentencing guidelines will reveal the delicate balance between criminalizing child pornography and upholding the United States’ constitution. In addition, discussing the role of Internet Service Providers will expose a trend toward using the same technology, which has proliferated the child pornography industry, to identify and censor the illegal content on the Internet. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of the current laws and regulation tactics, as well as, the suggested amendments will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jenkins, P.: Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the internet. New York University Press, New York (2001)
Duncan, K.: Child pornography and First Amendment standards. Mississippi Law Journal 76, 677–703 (2007)
Tate, T.: Child Pornography: An Investigation. Methuen, London (1990)
Michaels, R.: Criminal Law – The insufficiency of possession in prohibition of child pornography statutes: Why viewing a crime scene should be criminal. West New England Law Review 30(3), 817–866 (2008)
Akdeniz, Y.: Internet child pornography and the law: National and international responses. Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington (2008)
Adler, A.: The perverse law of child pornography. The Columbia Law Review 101(2), 209–273 (2001)
United States Sentencing Commission. The history of the child pornography guidelines (2009), http://www.ussc.gov/general/20091030_History_Child_Pornography_Guidelines.pdf (retrieved)
Mota, S.A.: The U.S. Supreme Court addresses the Child Pornography Prevention Act and Child Online Protection Act in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition and Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union. Federal Communications Law Journal 55(1), 85–98 (2002)
Akdeniz, Y.: The regulation of pornography and child pornography on the internet. Journal of Information, Law, and Technology 1 (2002), http://ssrn.com/abstract=41684 (retrieved) or doi:10.2139/ssrn.41684
PROTECT Act, S. 151, 108th Cong. (2003), http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&docid=f:s151enr.txt.pdf (retrieved)
Protection of Children From Sexual Predators Act of 1998, H.R. 3494, 105th Cong. (1998), http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c105:./temp/~c105xXcSuG (retrieved)
PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008, S. 1738, 110th Cong. (2008), http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:s1738enr.txt.pdf (retrieved)
Wortley, R., Smallbone, S.: Child pornography on the internet. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Problem-Specific Guides Series No. 41. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services website (2006), http://www.cops.usdoj.gov
Sutton, L.: Internet filtering software and its effects. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences 3, 2977–2982 (2010), doi:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044425
Morris, J.B., Wong, C.M.: Revisiting user control: The emergence and success of a First Amendment theory for the internet age. First Amendment Law Review 8, 109–137 (2009)
Bartow, A.: Open access, law, knowledge, copyrights, dominance and subordination. Lewis & Clark Law Review 10(4), 869–884 (2006)
Hakim, D. Net providers to block sites with child sex. The New York Times (June 10, 2008), www.nytimes.com (retrieved)
Dedman, B., Sullivan, B.: ISPs are pressed to become child porn cops: New Law, new monitoring technology raise concerns about privacy (October 16, 2008), http://www.msnbc.msn.com (retrieved)
Combating child abuse on the web: Germany resists EU plans to block child porn sites. Spiegel Online (March 3, 2010), http://www.spiegel.de/international (retrieved)
McNamee, J.: Out of sight, out of mind. Index on Censorship 39(1), 108–117 (2010), doi:10.1177/0306422010362320
Bowen, K.: Blocking access to child porn doesn’t help victims, expert says. Interview by S. Sinico (August 6, 2009), http://www.dw-world.de (retrieved)
McNamee, J.: Pointless action on child pornography: Blocking websites that show images of child abuse doesn’t work – but EU politicians still think it is a better policy than deletion. The Guardian (March 29, 2010), http://www.guardian.co.uk (retrieved)
Malamuth, N., Huppin, M.: Drawing the line on virtual child pornography: Bringing the law in line with the research evidence. N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change 31, 773–790 (2007)
Bourke, M.L., Hernandez, A.E.: The ‘Butner study’ redux: A report of the incidence of hands-on child victimization by child pornography offenders. Journal of Family Violence 24, 183–191 (2009)
Basbaum, J.P.: Sentencing for possession of child pornography: A failure to distinguish voyeurs from pederasts. Hastings Law Journal 61, 1–24 (2010)
Hessick, C.B.: Disentangling child pornography from child sex abuse. Washington University Law Review 88 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Seigfried-Spellar, K.C., Bertoline, G.R., Rogers, M.K. (2012). Internet Child Pornography, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, and the Role of Internet Service Providers. In: Gladyshev, P., Rogers, M.K. (eds) Digital Forensics and Cyber Crime. ICDF2C 2011. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 88. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35515-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35515-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35514-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35515-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)