Skip to main content

The Two Cultures of Logic

  • Chapter
On Fuzziness

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 299))

  • 1109 Accesses

Abstract

In his famous Rede Lecture of 1959, the physicist, novellist and polymath C.P.Snow put forward his thesis of the Two Cultures [13]. Snow observed that a gulf had appeared between two academic cultures, with engineers and scientists on one side, and scholars in the humanities on the other. Snow lamented that little communication went on across the gulf, so that most representatives of each of the two academic cultures lacks the most basic understanding, and appreciation, of the other. My thesis, in this written homage to Lotfi Zadeh, is that something akin to Snow’s gulf runs through mathematical logic. For even though logic is a science, there are two types of logicians: on one side of the gulf are those who insist on using True and False (and, possibly, Indeterminate or Undefined) as the only possible truth values; on the other side are those logicians who embrace a wealth of different truth values, with True and False as the extremes of a continuum; to denote the latter area of work, which covers a large variety of approaches including (but not limited to) Fuzzy Logic, we shall loosely use the term multi-valued logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, I., Malakasiotis, P.: A Survey of Paraphrasing and Textual Entailment Methods. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 38, 135–187 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.): Handbook of Logic and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, M.: An Introduction to Many-Valued and Fuzzy Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Edgington, D.: Validity, Uncertainty and Vagueness. Analysis 52, 193–204 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Edgington, D.: Vagueness by Degrees. In: [10]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fine, K.: Vagueness, Truth and Logic. Synthese 30, 265–300 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, E., Driedger, N., Kittredge, R.: Using Natural Language Processing to Produce Weather Forecasts. IEEE Expert 9(2), 45–53 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter, J., Freer, Y., Gatt, A., Reiter, E., Sripada, S., Sykes, C., Westwater, D.: BT-Nurse: Computer Generation of Natural Language Shift Summaries from Complex Heterogeneous Medical Data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) 18(5), 621–624 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lipman, B.L.: Why is Language Vague? Working Paper. Department of Economics, Boston University (December 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keefe, R., Smith, P. (eds.): Theories of Vagueness. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moxey, L.M., Sanford, A.J.: Communicating Quantities: A Review of Psycholinguistic Evidence of How Expressions Determine Perspectives. Applied Psychology 14(3), 237–255 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Snow, P.C.: The Two Cultures, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Deemter, K.: Utility and Language Generation: The Case of Vagueness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38(6), 607–632 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. van Deemter, K.: Not Exactly: in Praise of Vagueness. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Kluwer/Nijhoff, Boston (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Deemter, K. (2013). The Two Cultures of Logic. In: Seising, R., Trillas, E., Moraga, C., Termini, S. (eds) On Fuzziness. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35644-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35644-5_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35644-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics