Skip to main content

Exploiting Natural Language Definitions and (Legacy) Data for Facilitating Agreement Processes

  • Conference paper
Software Quality. Increasing Value in Software and Systems Development (SWQD 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 133))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In IT, ontologies to enable semantic interoperability is only of the branches in which agreement between a heterogeneous group of stakeholders are of vital importance. As agreements are the result of interactions, appropriate methods should take into account the natural language used by the community. In this paper, we extend a method for reaching a consensus on a conceptualization within a community of stakeholders, exploiting the natural language communication between the stakeholders. We describe how agreements on informal and formal descriptions are complementary and interplay. To this end, we introduce, describe and motivate the nature of some of the agreements and the two distinct levels of commitment. We furthermore show how these commitments can be exploited to steer the agreement processes. Concepts introduced in this paper have been implemented in a tool for collaborative ontology engineering, called GOSPL, which can be also adopted for other purposes, e.g., the construction a lexicon for larger software projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R.: R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language. W3C Working Draft (May 29, 2012), http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/

  2. De Leenheer, P., Christiaens, S., Meersman, R.: Business semantics management: A case study for competency-centric HRM. Computers in Industry 61(8), 760–775 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Debruyne, C., Meersman, R.: Semantic Interoperation of Information Systems by Evolving Ontologies through Formalized Social Processes. In: Eder, J., Bielikova, M., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) ADBIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6909, pp. 444–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Debruyne, C., Meersman, R.: GOSPL: A Method and Tool for Fact-Oriented Hybrid Ontology Engineering. In: Morzy, T., Härder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds.) ADBIS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7503, pp. 153–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Debruyne, C., Reul, Q., Meersman, R.: GOSPL: Grounding Ontologies with Social Processes and Natural Language. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) ITNG 2010, pp. 1255–1256. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Troyer, O., Meersman, R., Ponsaert, F.: RIDL user guide. Research report (available from the authors). Int. Centre for Information Analysis Services, Control Data (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, Ó.: Ontological Engineering with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management. In: e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2003) ISBN: 1852335513

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hitzler, P., Krotzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Primer. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/

  9. Kotis, K., Vouros, A.: Human-centered ontology engineering: The hcome methodology. Knowledge Information Systems 10(1), 109–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manola, F., Miller, E.: RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/

  11. Meersman, R.: The RIDL conceptual language. Research report (available from the authors). Int. Centre for Information Analysis Services, Control Data (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meersman, R.: The use of lexicons and other computer-linguistic tools in semantics, design and cooperation of database systems. In: Zhang, Y., Rusinkiewicz, M., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) The Proceedings of the Second Int. Symposium on Cooperative Database Systems for Advanced Applications (CODAS 1999), pp. 1–14. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation (January 15, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  14. Sahoo, S.S., Halb, W., Hellmann, S., Idehen, K., Thibodeau, T., Auer, S., Sequeda, J., Ezzat, A.: A survey of current approaches for mapping of relational databases to RDF (2009), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_SurveyReport.pdf

  15. Schwitter, R.: A Controlled Natural Language Layer for the Semantic Web. In: Zhang, S., Jarvis, R.A. (eds.) AI 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3809, pp. 425–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Simperl, E.P.B., Tempich, C.: Ontology Engineering: A Reality Check. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 836–854. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Siorpaes, K., Simperl, E.: Human intelligence in the process of semantic content creation. World Wide Web 13(1-2), 33–59 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tudorache, T., Noy, N., Tu, S., Musen, M.: Supporting Collaborative Ontology Development in Protégé. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Verheyden, P., De Bo, J., Meersman, R.: Semantically Unlocking Database Content Through Ontology-Based Mediation. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Vrandecic, D., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 85–96 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wintraecken, J.: The NIAM Information Analysis Method, Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debruyne, C., Vasquez, C. (2013). Exploiting Natural Language Definitions and (Legacy) Data for Facilitating Agreement Processes. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. Increasing Value in Software and Systems Development. SWQD 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 133. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35702-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35702-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35701-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35702-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics