Skip to main content

Attack Interference: A Path to Defending Security Protocols

  • Conference paper
E-Business and Telecommunications (ICETE 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 314))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Traditionally security protocol analysis relies on a single Dolev-Yao attacker. This type of attacker is so powerful that overall attack power does not change if additional attackers cooperate. In this paper, we take a fundamentally different approach and investigate the case of multiple non-collaborating attackers. We show how non-collaboration between attackers gives rise to interference between ongoing attacks and that it is possible to actively exploit attack interference to mitigate security breaches and provide partial protection to weak protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arsac, W., Bella, G., Chantry, X., Compagna, L.: Validating Security Protocols under the General Attacker. In: Degano, P., ViganĂ², L. (eds.) ARSPA-WITS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5511, pp. 34–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Arsac, W., Bella, G., Chantry, X., Compagna, L.: Multi-attacker protocol validation. Journal of Automated Reasoning 46(3), 353–388 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Basin, D., Caleiro, C., Ramos, J., ViganĂ², L.: Distributed temporal logic for the analysis of security protocol models. Theoretical Computer Science 412(31), 4007–4043 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Basin, D., Capkun, S., Schaller, P., Schmidt, B.: Let’s Get Physical: Models and Methods for Real-World Security Protocols. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bella, G., Bistarelli, S., Massacci, F.: A Protocol’s Life After Attacks.. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Malcolm, J.A., Roe, M. (eds.) Security Protocols 2003. LNCS, vol. 3364, pp. 3–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bella, G., Bistarelli, S., Massacci, F.: Retaliation against protocol attacks. Journal of Information Assurance and Security 3, 313–325 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, C., Mathuria, A.: Protocols for Authentication and Key Establishment. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caleiro, C., ViganĂ², L., Basin, D.: Metareasoning about security protocols using distributed temporal logic. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 125(1), 67–89 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caleiro, C., ViganĂ², L., Basin, D.: On the Semantics of Alice & Bob Specifications of Security Protocols. Theoretical Computer Science 367(1-2), 88–122 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Comon-Lundh, H., Cortier, V.: Security Properties: Two Agents Are Sufficient. In: Degano, P. (ed.) ESOP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2618, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dilloway, C., Lowe, G.: On the specification of secure channels. In: Proceedings of WITS 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolev, D., Yao, A.C.: On the security of public key protocols. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 29(2), 198–208 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiazza, M.-C., Peroli, M., ViganĂ², L.: Attack Interference in Non-Collaborative Scenarios for Security Protocol Analysis. In: Proceedings of SECRYPT 2011, pp. 144–156. SciTePress (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kamil, A., Lowe, G.: Specifying and Modelling Secure Channels in Strand Spaces. In: Degano, P., Guttman, J.D. (eds.) FAST 2009. LNCS, vol. 5983, pp. 233–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Millen, J.K., Denker, G.: Capsl and mucapsl. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology 4, 16–27 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mödersheim, S., ViganĂ², L., Basin, D.A.: Constraint differentiation: Search-space reduction for the constraint-based analysis of security protocols. Journal of Computer Security 18(4), 575–618 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaller, P., Schmidt, B., Basin, D., Capkun, S.: Modeling and verifying physical properties of security protocols for wireless networks. In: Proceedings of CSF, vol. 22. IEEE Computer Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Syverson, P., Meadows, C., Cervesato, I.: Dolev-Yao is no better than Machiavelli. In: Proceedings of WITS 2000, pp. 87–92 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fiazza, MC., Peroli, M., ViganĂ², L. (2012). Attack Interference: A Path to Defending Security Protocols. In: Obaidat, M.S., Sevillano, J.L., Filipe, J. (eds) E-Business and Telecommunications. ICETE 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35755-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35755-8_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35754-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35755-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics