Abstract
The role of two-dimensional process graphing in Adaptive Case Management (ACM) is examined. Three design criteria are identified for ACM that were never considered for BPMN. The question for discussion is whether these requirements eliminate all kinds of flow-chart type languages from consideration for use as a process modeling language for users of ACM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Swenson, K.D.: A Visual Language to Describe Collaborative Work. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop for Visual Languages (1993)
Swenson, K.D.: Visual Support for Reengineering Work Processes. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems (1993)
Swenson, K.D., et al.: A business process environment supporting collaborative planning. Journal of Collaborative Computing (1994)
Swenson, K.D.: Workflow for the Information Worker. In: Fisher, L. (ed.) Workflow Handbook 2001. Future Strategies (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Swenson, K.D. (2013). Position: BPMN Is Incompatible with ACM. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36284-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36285-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)