Abstract
We study a general stochastic probing problem defined on a universe V, where each element e ∈ V is “active” independently with probability p e . Elements have weights {w e :e ∈ V} and the goal is to maximize the weight of a chosen subset S of active elements. However, we are given only the p e values—to determine whether or not an element e is active, our algorithm must probe e. If element e is probed and happens to be active, then e must irrevocably be added to the chosen set S; if e is not active then it is not included in S. Moreover, the following conditions must hold in every random instantiation:
-
the set Q of probed elements satisfy an “outer” packing constraint,
-
the set S of chosen elements satisfy an “inner” packing constraint.
The kinds of packing constraints we consider are intersections of matroids and knapsacks. Our results provide a simple and unified view of results in stochastic matching [1, 2] and Bayesian mechanism design [3], and can also handle more general constraints. As an application, we obtain the first polynomial-time Ω(1/k)-approximate “Sequential Posted Price Mechanism” under k-matroid intersection feasibility constraints, improving on prior work [3-5].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, N., Immorlica, N., Karlin, A.R., Mahdian, M., Rudra, A.: Approximating Matches Made in Heaven. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5555, pp. 266–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Bansal, N., Gupta, A., Li, J., Mestre, J., Nagarajan, V., Rudra, A.: When LP Is the Cure for Your Matching Woes: Improved Bounds for Stochastic Matchings. Algorithmica 63, 733–762 (2012)
Chawla, S., Hartline, J.D., Malec, D.L., Sivan, B.: Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. In: STOC, pp. 311–320 (2010)
Yan, Q.: Mechanism Design via Correlation Gap. In: SODA, pp. 710–719 (2011)
Kleinberg, R., Weinberg, S.M.: Matroid prophet inequalities. In: STOC, pp. 123–136 (2012)
Möhring, R.H., Schulz, A.S., Uetz, M.: Approximation in stochastic scheduling: the power of LP-based priority policies. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 46, 924–942 (1999)
Dean, B.C., Goemans, M.X., Vondrák, J.: Approximating the stochastic knapsack problem: the benefit of adaptivity. Math. Oper. Res. 33, 945–964 (2008)
Dean, B.C., Goemans, M.X., Vondrák, J.: Adaptivity and approximation for stochastic packing problems. In: SODA, pp. 395–404 (2005)
Guha, S., Munagala, K.: Approximation algorithms for budgeted learning problems. In: STOC, pp. 104–113 (2007)
Adamczyk, M.: Improved analysis of the greedy algorithm for stochastic matching. Inf. Process. Lett. 111, 731–737 (2011)
Fisher, M., Nemhauser, G., Wolsey, L.: An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions II. Mathematical Programming Study 8, 73–87 (1978)
Jenkyns, T.: The efficiency of the “greedy” algorithm. In: 7th South Eastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing, pp. 341–350 (1976)
Chekuri, C., Vondrák, J., Zenklusen, R.: Submodular function maximization via the multilinear relaxation and contention resolution schemes. In: STOC, pp. 783–792 (2011), Full version http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4593
Sandholm, T., Gilpin, A.: Sequences of take-it-or-leave-it offers: near-optimal auctions without full valuation revelation. In: 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, pp. 1127–1134 (2006)
Blumrosen, L., Holenstein, T.: Posted prices vs. negotiations: an asymptotic analysis. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2008)
Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58–73 (1981)
Bhalgat, A., Goel, A., Khanna, S.: Improved approximation results for stochastic knapsack problems. In: SODA, pp. 1647–1665 (2011)
Bhalgat, A.: A (2 + ε)-approximation algorithm for the stochastic knapsack problem (2011) (manuscript)
Vohra, R.: Mechanism Design: A Linear Programming Approach. Cambridge University Press (2011)
Bhattacharya, S., Goel, G., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Budget constrained auctions with heterogeneous items. In: STOC, pp. 379–388 (2010)
Schrijver, A.: Combinatorial Optimization. Springer (2003)
Chekuri, C., Mydlarz, M., Shepherd, F.B.: Multicommodity demand flow in a tree and packing integer programs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 3 (2007)
Bansal, N., Korula, N., Nagarajan, V., Srinivasan, A.: On k-Column Sparse Packing Programs. In: Eisenbrand, F., Shepherd, F.B. (eds.) IPCO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6080, pp. 369–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gupta, A., Nagarajan, V. (2013). A Stochastic Probing Problem with Applications. In: Goemans, M., Correa, J. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7801. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36694-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36694-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36693-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36694-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)