Abstract
Research in the field of Opinion Dynamics studies how the distribution of opinions in a population of agents alters over time, as a consequence of interactions among the agents and/or in response to external influencing factors. One of most widely-cited items of literature in this field is a paper by Deffuant et al. (2002) introducing the Relative Agreement (RA) model of opinion dynamics, published in the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS). In a recent paper published in the same journal, Meadows & Cliff (2012) questioned some of the results published in Deffuant et al. (2002) and released public-domain source-code for implementations of the RA model that follow the description given by Deffuant et al., but which generate results with some significant qualitative differences. The results published by Meadows & Cliff (2012) follow the methodology of Deffuant et al. (2002), simulating a population of agents in which, in principle, any agent can influence the opinion of any other agent. That is, the ”social network” of the simulated agents is a fully connected graph. In contrast, in this paper we report on the results from a series of empirical experiments where the social network of the agent population is non-trivially structured, using the stochastic network construction algorithm introduced by Klemm & Eguiluz (2002), which allows variation of a single real-valued control parameter μ KE over the range [0,1], and which produces network topologies that have ”small world” characteristics when μ KE =0 and that have ”scale free” characteristics when μ KE =1. Using the public-domain source-code published in JASSS, we have studied the response of the dynamics of the RA model of opinion dynamics in populations of agents with complex social networks. Our primary findings are that variations in the clustering coefficient of the social networks (induced by altering μ KE ) have a significant effect on the opinion dynamics of the RA model operating on those networks, whereas the effect of variations in average shortest path length is much weaker.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amblard, F., Deffuant, G.: The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the Relative Agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A 343, 725–738 (2004)
BarabáSi, A., Albert, R.: Emergence of Scaling in Random Network. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
Brehm, S., Brehm, J.: Psychological Reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic Press, New York (1981)
De Groot, M.: Reaching a Consensus. J. Am. Statis. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)
Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3, 87–98 (2000)
Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., Faure, T.: How can extremism prevail? J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(4), 1 (2002)
Deffuant, G.: Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3), 8 (2006)
Friedkin, N.: Choice Shift & Group Polarization. Am. Socio. Rev. 64(6), 856–875 (1999)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3), 2 (2002)
Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V.: Growing Scale-Free Networks with Small-World Behavior. Physical Review E 65, 057102 (2002)
Krause, U.: A Discrete Nonlinear and Non-Autonomous Model of Consensus Formation. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Difference Equations, August 27-31, pp. 227–236 (1998-2000)
Lorenz, J., Deffuant, G.: The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A 343, 725–738 (2005)
Lorenz, J.: Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1–20 (2007)
Meadows, M., Cliff, D.: Reexamining the Relative Agreement Model of Opinion Dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 15(4), 4 (2012)
Meadows, M., Cliff, D.: The Relative Agreement model of opinion dynamics in populations with complex social network structure (forthcoming, 2013) (manuscript)
Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective Dynamics of Small-World Networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Meadows, M., Cliff, D. (2013). The Relative Agreement Model of Opinion Dynamics in Populations with Complex Social Network Structure. In: Ghoshal, G., Poncela-Casasnovas, J., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Complex Networks IV. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 476. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36844-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36843-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36844-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)