Skip to main content

Towards a Logic of Information Exchange

An Inquisitive Witness Semantics

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2011)

Introduction

Traditionally, the meaning of a sentence is identified with its truth conditions. This approach is driven by the age-old attention that philosophy has devoted to the study of argumentation. In terms of truth conditions one defines entailment, the crucial notion that rules the soundness of an argument: a sentence ϕ is said to entail another sentence ψ in case the truth conditions for ϕ are at least as stringent as the truth conditions for ψ.

We are very grateful to Morgan Mameni and Matthijs Westera for helpful discussions of the issues addresses in this paper and many closely related topics. Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the Prague Workshop on the Logic of Questions, October 26, 2011; and at the workshop In Search of Answers: The Guiding Role of Questions in Discourse and Epistemology, Center for Formal Epistemology, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburg, November 5, 2011. The research reported here was made possible by financial support from the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO), which is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belnap, N.: Questions, their presuppositions, and how they can arise. In: Lambert, K. (ed.) The Logical Way of Doing Things. Yale University Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Büring, D.: On d-trees, beans, and accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 511–545 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson, L.: Dialogue Games. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chierchia, G.: Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1(2), 181–234 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciardelli, I.: Inquisitive semantics and intermediate logics, Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ciardelli, I.: A First-Order Inquisitive Semantics. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Logic, Language and Meaning. LNCS, vol. 6042, pp. 234–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciardelli, I., Cornelisse, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Computing Compliance. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds.) LORI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5834, pp. 55–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics: a new notion of meaning (2012); forthcoming in Language and Linguistics Compass

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics. NASSLLI Lecture Notes (2012), http://www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

  11. Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40(1), 55–94 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, H.: Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Engdahl, E.: Constituent questions: The syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farkas, D., Bruce, K.: On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27, 81–118 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farkas, D., Roelofsen, F.: Polar initiatives and polarity particle responses in an inquisitive discourse model. Presented at the Amsterdam Colloquium, December 2011, and at the Newcastle Workshop on the Syntax of Answers to Polar Questions (June 2012), www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

  16. Ginzburg, J.: Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In: Seligman, J. (ed.) Language, Logic, and Computation, vol. 1 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Groenendijk, J.: The logic of interrogation. In: Matthews, T., Strolovitch, D. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp. 109–126. Cornell University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Groenendijk, J.: Inquisitive Semantics: Two Possibilities for Disjunction. In: Bosch, P., Gabelaia, D., Lang, J. (eds.) TbiLLC 2007. LNCS, vol. 5422, pp. 80–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Groenendijk, J.: Erotetic languages and the inquisitive hierarchy (2011), in a Festschrift for Martin Stokhof, www.vddoes.net/Martin/articles/Jeroen.pdf

  20. Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Presented at the Workshop on Language, Communication, and Rational Agency at Stanford (May 2009), www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitive-semantics

  21. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gunlogson, C.: True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Santa Cruz (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamblin, C.I.: Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37, 130–155 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamblin, C.L.: Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 41–53 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harrah, D.: The logic of questions. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosohical Logic, 2nd edn., vol. 8, pp. 1–60. Kluwer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hulstijn, J.: Structured information states: raising and resolving issues. In: Benz, A., Jäger, G. (eds.) Proceedings of MunDial (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jäger, G.: Only updates: on the dynamics of the focus particle only. In: Dekker, P., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Kubiński, T.: An outline of the logical theory of questions. Akademie Verlag (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mascarenhas, S.: Inquisitive semantics and logic, Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts, C.: Information structure in discourse. In: Yoon, J., Kathol, A. (eds.) OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 49, pp. 91–136. Ohio State University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roelofsen, F.: Algebraic Foundations for Inquisitive Semantics. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Lang, J., Ju, S. (eds.) LORI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6953, pp. 233–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Stalnaker, R.: Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315–332 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wiśniewski, A.: The logic of questions as a theory of erotetic arguments. Synthese 109(1), 1–25 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F. (2013). Towards a Logic of Information Exchange. In: Bezhanishvili, G., Löbner, S., Marra, V., Richter, F. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7758. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36976-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36976-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36975-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36976-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics