Skip to main content

Can Diversity amongst Learners Improve Online Object Tracking?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7872))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a novel analysis of the state of the art in object tracking with respect to diversity found in its main component, an ensemble classifier that is updated in an online manner. We employ established measures for diversity and performance from the rich literature on ensemble classification and online learning, and present a detailed evaluation of diversity and performance on benchmark sequences in order to gain an insight into how the tracking performance can be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babenko, B., Yang, M.H., Belongie, S.: Robust object tracking with online multiple instance learning. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33(8) (August 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertolami, R., Bunke, H.: Diversity analysis for ensembles of word sequence recognisers. In: Yeung, D.-Y., Kwok, J.T., Fred, A., Roli, F., de Ridder, D. (eds.) SSPR&SPR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4109, pp. 677–686. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 24, 123–140 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, G., Kuncheva, L.I.: “Good” and “Bad” Diversity in Majority Vote Ensembles. In: El Gayar, N., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5997, pp. 124–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, G., Wyatt, J., Harris, R., Yao, X.: Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation. Journal of Information Fusion 6, 5–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H., Yao, X.: Multiobjective neural network ensembles based on regularized negative correlation learning. Knowledge and Data Engineering 22(12) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins, R.T., Liu, Y., Leordeanu, M.: Online selection of discriminative tracking features. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(10), 1631–1643 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dietterich, T.G.: Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietterich, T.G., Bakiri, G.: Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision 88(2), 303–338 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In: Vitányi, P.M.B. (ed.) EuroCOLT 1995. LNCS, vol. 904, pp. 23–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Frinken, V., Peter, T., Fischer, A., Bunke, H., Do, T.-M.-T., Artieres, T.: Improved handwriting recognition by combining two forms of hidden markov models and a recurrent neural network. In: Jiang, X., Petkov, N. (eds.) CAIP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5702, pp. 189–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Grabner, H., Bischof, H.: On-line boosting and vision. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grabner, H., Leistner, C., Bischof, H.: Semi-supervised On-Line boosting for robust tracking. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5302, pp. 234–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho, T.K.: The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(8), 832–844 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., Matas, J.: Tracking-Learning-detection. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34(7), 1409–1422 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J.: Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy. Machine Learning 51(2), 181–207 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy, N., Wolf, L.: Minimal correlation classification. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 7577, pp. 29–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Y., Yao, X., Higuchi, T.: Evolutionary ensembles with negative correlation learning. Evolutionary Computation 4(4), 380–387 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Minku, L.L., White, A.P., Yao, X.: The Impact of Diversity on Online Ensemble Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift. Knowledge and Data Engineering 22(5), 730–742 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oza, N.C.: Online Bagging and Boosting. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ozuysal, M., Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Fua, P.: Fast keypoint recognition using random ferns. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32(3), 448–461 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saffari, A., Leistner, C., Santner, J., Godec, M., Bischof, H.: On-line random forests. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Santner, J., Leistner, C., Saffari, A., Pock, T., Bischof, H.: PROST: Parallel robust online simple tracking. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Visentini, I., Kittler, J., Foresti, G.L.: Diversity-based classifier selection for adaptive object tracking. In: Benediktsson, J.A., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5519, pp. 438–447. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, Q., Dinh, T.B., Medioni, G.: Online tracking and reacquisition using co-trained generative and discriminative trackers. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5303, pp. 678–691. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nebehay, G., Chibamu, W., Lewis, P.R., Chandra, A., Pflugfelder, R., Yao, X. (2013). Can Diversity amongst Learners Improve Online Object Tracking?. In: Zhou, ZH., Roli, F., Kittler, J. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7872. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38067-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38067-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38066-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38067-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics