Skip to main content

Statistical Characteristics of Portal Images and Their Influence in Noise Reduction

  • Conference paper
Natural and Artificial Models in Computation and Biology (IWINAC 2013)

Abstract

Portal imaging is used in radiotherapy to asses the correct positioning of the patient before applying the treatment. Given the high energy particles used in portal image formation, portal image is intrinsically bound by low contrast and poor spatial resolution. The relevance of portal imaging in radiotherapy treatments and its common use justify efforts to improve its inherent low quality.

The knowledge of the statistical properties of both image and noise is essential in order to develop suitable processing algorithms to clean the image. The aim of this paper is to show how the statistical characteristics of the portal images and noise images generated in one of the portal imaging systems most widely deployed, can be exploited to improve the quality of noisy portal images through efficient denoising methods.

An ensemble of portal images is used to investigate their statistical characteristics. In the case of noise, a process of averaging and subtraction of the mean is used to extract noise images.

The distribution found for the noise is clearly Gaussian, in both the spatial and the wavelet domain. The curves for the noise show a parabolic shape in the semi-log graphs across the different scales, which translates into Gaussian character in the transformed domain. On the other hand, the probability density functions (pdf’s) for portal images show large tails.

Wavelet thresholding takes advantage of the different statistical features found for noise and signal. In the present work wavelet thresholding is compared to Wiener filtering, and the assesment of the denoised image is carried out by means of the peak signal to noise ratio PSNR and the structural similarity index SSMI.

Thresholding the wavelet coefficients of the noisy image gives better denoising results for both figures of merit (PSNR and SSIM) than the Wiener filter in all the analysed cases. Furthermore, the differences between the methods increase as the noise increases. abstract environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Herman, M., Balter, J., Jaffray, D., McGee, K., Munro, P., Shalev, S., Van Herk, M., Wong, J.: Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. Med. Phy. 28(5), 712–737 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonuk, L.: Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. Phys. Med. Biol. 47(6), R31 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donoho, D., Johnstone, J.: Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3), 425–455 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Simoncelli, E., Adelson, E.: Noise Removal Via Bayesian Wavelet Coring (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Portilla, J., Strela, V., Wainwright, M., Simoncelli, E.: Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process 12(11), 1338–1351 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrari, R.J., Winsor, R.: Digital radiographic image denoising via wavelet-based hidden Markov model estimation. Journal of Digital Imaging 18(2), 154–167 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver, J., Yansun, X., Healy, D., Cromwell, L.: Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 21(2), 288–295 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donoho, D.: De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 41(3), 613–627 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Donoho, D., Johnstone, J.: Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1200–1224 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Vidakovic, B.: Nonlinear wavelet shrinkage with bayes rules and bayes factors. J. of the American Statistical Association 93, 173–179 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Stein, C.: Estimation of the Mean of a Multivariate Normal Distribution. The Annals of Statistics 9(6), 1135–1151 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

González-López, A., Bastida-Jumilla, MC., Larrey-Ruiz, J., Morales-Sánchez, J. (2013). Statistical Characteristics of Portal Images and Their Influence in Noise Reduction. In: Ferrández Vicente, J.M., Álvarez Sánchez, J.R., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, F.J. (eds) Natural and Artificial Models in Computation and Biology. IWINAC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7930. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38637-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38637-4_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38636-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38637-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics