Skip to main content

A Refinement Operator for Inducing Threaded-Variable Clauses

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7842))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 593 Accesses

Abstract

In Logic Programming, a thread of input/output variables is often used to carry state information through the body literals of the clauses that make up a logic program. When using Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) to synthesise logic programs, the standard refinement operators that define the search space cannot enforce this pattern and non-conforming clauses have to be discarded after being constructed. We present a new refinement operator that defines a search space that only includes Horn clauses that conform to this pattern of input/output variable threads, dramatically narrowing the search space and ILP run times. We further support our theoretical justification of the new operator with experimental results over a variety of datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asuncion, A., Newman, D.J.: UCI machine learning repository. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences (2007), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  • Badea, L., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H.: A refinement operator for description logics. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Optimizing the crisp representation of the fuzzy description logic \(\cal \mathcal{SROIQ}\). In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005-2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5327, pp. 189–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the CLASSIC description logic: Theoretical and experimental results. In: Proceedings 4th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 121–133 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussens, J., Pulman, S.: Experiments in inductive chart parsing. In: Cussens, J., Džeroski, S. (eds.) LLL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1925, pp. 143–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fanizzi, N.: Concept induction in Description Logics using information-theoretic heuristics. Intl. J. on Semantic Web and Information Systems 7(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Fanizzi, N.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in the semantic web. Journal of Applied Intelligence 26(2), 139–159 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantopoulos, S., Charalambidis, A.: Formulating description logic learning as an inductive logic programming task. In: Proceedings of Intl Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2010), July 18-23. IEEE, Barcelona (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J., Michalski, R.S.: Inductive inference of VL decision rules. ACM SIGART Bulletin 63, 38–44 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: A refinement operator based learning algorithm for the \(\mathcal{ALC}\) description logic. In: Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J., Tadepalli, P. (eds.) ILP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4894, pp. 147–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lisi, F.A., Straccia, U.: Can ILP deal with incomplete and vague structured knowledge? In: Proceedings ILP, Windsor Great Park, U.K. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggleton, S.: Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing 13, 245–286 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F., Warren, D.S.: Parsing as deduction. In: Dunno (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the ACL, pp. 137–144 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, A.: The Aleph Manual (2004), http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/machinelearning/Aleph/

  • Tomita, M.: Efficient Parsing for Natural Language. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • W3C OWL Working Group, OWL 2 web ontology language. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview

  • Zelle, J.M., Mooney, R.J.: Learning to parse database queries using Inductive Logic Programming. In: Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charalambidis, A., Konstantopoulos, S. (2013). A Refinement Operator for Inducing Threaded-Variable Clauses. In: Riguzzi, F., Železný, F. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7842. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38812-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38812-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38811-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38812-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics