Skip to main content

A Framework for Classifying Design Research Methods

  • Conference paper
Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design (DESRIST 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7939))

Abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) methods are much debated by the IS community with regard to outcome and research process. This debate creates ambiguity for the novice researchers in terms of selecting appropriate DSR methods. To address this ambiguity, this essay proposes a framework for classifying the DSR methods by providing conceptual clarity about DSR outcome and DSR research process. The proposed framework creates a taxonomy differentiating between outcomes as a priori formulated or emergent through contextual interaction, likewise, viewing the research process as deductive or abductive. The taxonomy provides guidance to the researchers before embarking any DSR projects. The essay contributes to the on-going discussion on utilization of the DSR methods in DSR projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G., El Sawy, O.: Building an information systems theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. In: MIS Quarterly 2004. MIS Quarterly & The Society for Information Management, pp. 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Livari, J.: A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 39–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sein, M.K., et al.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 19 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alturki, A., Gable, G., Bandara, W.: A design science research roadmap. Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research, 107–123 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aanestad, M.: What If Design Is Something Else: The Challenges of Dealing with Interdependencies. In: Keller, C., Wiberg, M., Ågerfalk, P.J., Eriksson Lundström, J.S.Z., et al. (eds.) SCIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 124, pp. 95–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Peffer, K., et al.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van de Ven, A.: Engaged Scholarship: Creating Knowledge for Science and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baskerville, R., Wood-Harper, A.T.: Diversity in Information Systems Research Methods. European Journal of Information Systems 7(2), 17 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mårtensson, P., Lee, A.: Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation. MIS Quarterly 28(3), 29 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.R.: Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. In: ECIS 2008 Proceedings (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K.: Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM 32(10), 1199–1216 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, C., Gregor, S.: Forms of reasoning in the design science research process. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 17–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fölstad, A.: Towards a Living Lab For the Development of Online Community Services. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10(Special Issue in Living Labs) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Hoist, M., Stahlbrost, A.: Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. In: System Sciences, in 42nd Hawaii International Conference on HICSS 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harnesk, D., Thapa, D. (2013). A Framework for Classifying Design Research Methods. In: vom Brocke, J., Hekkala, R., Ram, S., Rossi, M. (eds) Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design. DESRIST 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7939. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38827-9_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38827-9_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38826-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38827-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics