Abstract
The Object Constraint Language (OCL) is becoming more and more popular for model-based engineering, in particular for the development of models and model transformations. OCL is supported by a variety of analysis tools having different scopes, aims and technological corner stones. The spectrum ranges from treating issues concerning formal proof techniques to testing approaches, from validation to verification, and from logic programming and rewriting to SAT-based technologies. This paper is a first step towards a well-founded benchmark for assessing validation and verification techniques on UML and OCL models. The paper puts forward a set of UML and OCL models together with particular questions for these models roughly characterized by the notions consistency, independence, consequences, and reachability. The paper sketches how these questions are handled by two OCL tools, USE and EMFtoCSP. The claim of the paper is not to present a complete benchmark right now. The paper is intended to initiate the development of further UML and OCL models and accompanying questions within the UML and OCL community. The OCL community is invited to check the presented UML and OCL models with their approaches and tools and to contribute further models and questions which emphasize the possibilities offered by their own tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernhard, K.: Aichernig and Percy Antonio Pari Salas. Test Case Generation by OCL Mutation and Constraint Solving. In: QSIC, pp. 64–71. IEEE Computer Society (2005)
Anastasakis, K., Bordbar, B., Georg, G., Ray, I.: On Challenges of Model Transformation from UML to Alloy. Software and System Modeling 9(1), 69–86 (2010)
Beckert, B., Giese, M., Hähnle, R., Klebanov, V., Rümmer, P., Schlager, S., Schmitt, P.H.: The KeY system 1.0 (Deduction Component). In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 379–384. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Boronat, A., Meseguer, J.: Algebraic Semantics of OCL-Constrained Metamodel Specifications. In: Oriol, M., Meyer, B. (eds.) TOOLS EUROPE 2009. LNBIP, vol. 33, pp. 96–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Brucker, A.D., Wolff, B.: HOL-OCL: A Formal Proof Environment for UML/OCL. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 97–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Büttner, F., Cabot, J.: Lightweight String Reasoning for OCL. In: Vallecillo, A., Tolvanen, J.-P., Kindler, E., Störrle, H., Kolovos, D. (eds.) ECMFA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7349, pp. 244–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Cabot, J., Clarisó, R., Riera, D.: UMLtoCSP: A Tool for the Formal Verification of UML/OCL Models using Constraint Programming. In: Stirewalt, R.E.K., Egyed, A., Fischer, B. (eds.) ASE, pp. 547–548. ACM (2007)
Cadoli, M., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Mancini, T.: Finite Model Reasoning on UML Class Diagrams Via Constraint Programming. In: Basili, R., Pazienza, M.T. (eds.) AI*IA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4733, pp. 36–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Calì, A., Gottlob, G., Orsi, G., Pieris, A.: Querying UML Class Diagrams. In: Birkedal, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7213, pp. 1–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Cabrera Castillos, K., Dadeau, F., Julliand, J., Taha, S.: Measuring Test Properties Coverage for Evaluating UML/OCL Model-Based Tests. In: Wolff, B., Zaïdi, F. (eds.) ICTSS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7019, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Chimiak-Opoka, J.D., Demuth, B.: A Feature Model for an IDE4OCL. ECEASST 36 (2010)
Clavel, M., Egea, M.: ITP/OCL: A Rewriting-Based Validation Tool for UML+OCL Static Class Diagrams. In: Johnson, M., Vene, V. (eds.) AMAST 2006. LNCS, vol. 4019, pp. 368–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Clavel, M., Egea, M., de Dios, M.A.G.: Checking Unsatisfiability for OCL Constraints. Electronic Communications of the EASST 24, 1–13 (2009)
Gogolla, M., Büttner, F., Cabot, J.: Initiating a Benchmark for UML and OCL Analysis Tools: Additional Material. Technical report, University of Bremen (2013), http://www.db.informatik.uni-bremen.de/publications/intern/GBC2013addon.pdf
Gogolla, M., Büttner, F., Richters, M.: USE: A UML-Based Specification Environment for Validating UML and OCL. Science of Computer Programming 69, 27–34 (2007)
Gonzalez, C.A., Büttner, F., Clariso, R., Cabot, J.: EMFtoCSP: A Tool for the Lightweight Verification of EMF Models. In: Gnesi, S., Gruner, S., Plat, N., Rumpe, B. (eds.) Proc. ICSE 2012 Workshop Formal Methods in Software Engineering: Rigorous and Agile Approaches, FormSERA (2012)
Hußmann, H., Demuth, B., Finger, F.: Modular Architecture for a Toolset Supporting OCL. Sci. Comput. Program. 44(1), 51–69 (2002)
Kyas, M., Fecher, H., de Boer, F.S., Jacob, J., Hooman, J., van der Zwaag, M., Arons, T., Kugler, H.: Formalizing UML Models and OCL Constraints in PVS. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 115, 39–47 (2005)
Maraee, A., Balaban, M.: Efficient Reasoning About Finite Satisfiability of UML Class Diagrams with Constrained Generalization Sets. In: Akehurst, D.H., Vogel, R., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMDA-FA. LNCS, vol. 4530, pp. 17–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Queralt, A., Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Teniente, E.: OCL-Lite: Finite Reasoning on UML/OCL Conceptual Schemas. Data Knowl. Eng. 73, 1–22 (2012)
Roldán, M., Durán, F.: Dynamic Validation of OCL Constraints with mOdCL. ECEASST 44 (2011)
Schleipen, M.: A Concept for Conformance Testing of AutomationML Models by Means of Formal Proof using OCL. In: ETFA, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2010)
Wille, R., Soeken, M., Drechsler, R.: Debugging of Inconsistent UML/OCL Models. In: Rosenstiel, W., Thiele, L. (eds.) DATE, pp. 1078–1083. IEEE (2012)
Willink, E.D.: Re-Engineering Eclipse MDT/OCL for Xtext. ECEASST 36 (2010)
Yatake, K., Aoki, T.: SMT-Based Enumeration of Object Graphs from UML Class Diagrams. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 37(4), 1–8 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gogolla, M., Büttner, F., Cabot, J. (2013). Initiating a Benchmark for UML and OCL Analysis Tools. In: Veanes, M., Viganò, L. (eds) Tests and Proofs. TAP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7942. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38916-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38916-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38915-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38916-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)