Skip to main content

Understanding the Digital Game Classification System: A Review of the Current Classification System and Its Implications for Use within Games for Health

  • Conference paper
Human Factors in Computing and Informatics (SouthCHI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7946))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses and identifies the current video game classification systems employed throughout North and South America, Europe, Eurasia, Far East and Australasia. Ten main systems are employed, and although there are similarities, there are differences across the systems concerning: content descriptors, rating process and age categories. This paper proposes a series of recommendations for the classification of off-the-shelf games used by clinicians within the healthcare sector, for ease of use and clarity while implementing games for rehabilitation use. It is suggested; a worldwide classification system would facilitate a greater understanding and eradicate issues which occur by clinicians, support networks and patients utilizing this innovative approach to aid rehabilitation. For such a system to be established, a number of regional organizations, industry professionals, academics and end-users would be required to outline a format, and establish an appropriate system to be utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Marston, H.R., Smith, S.T.: Interactive Videogame Technologies to Support Independence in the Elderly: A Narrative Review. Games for Health Journal 1(2), 139–152 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, S.T., Schoene, D.: The use of exercise-based videogames for training and rehabilitation of physical function in older adults: current practice and guideline for future research. Aging Health 8(3), 243–252 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Linden Labs, Second Life, PTSD education, http://secondlife.com/destination/t2-ptsd-education (accessed January 2012)

  4. Games: Improving Health, ESA, http://www.theesa.com/games-improving-what-matters/ESA_FS_Health_2011.pdf (accessed January 2012)

  5. Rosenberg, D., Depp, C.A., Vahia, I.V., Reichstadt, J., Palmer, B.W., Kerr, J., Norman, G., Jeste, D.V.: Exergames for Subsyndromal Depression in Older Adults: A Pilot Study of a Novel Intervention. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 18(3), 221–226 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Entertainment Software Rating Board (ERSB), http://www.esrb.org/index-js.jsp (accessed January 2012)

  7. Pan European Game Information (PEGI), http://www.pegi.info/en/index/id/28/ (accessed January 2012)

  8. Australian Classification Board (ACB), http://www.classification.gov.au/ (accessed January 2012)

  9. Australian Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 (2008). Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games. Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra (2011), http://resources.news.com.au/files/2011/05/25/1226062/865826-guidelines-for-computer-games-classification.pdf

  10. Office of Film & Literature Classification, New Zealand (OFLC), http://www.censorship.govt.nz/industry/industry-games.html (accessed January 2012)

  11. Computer Entertainment Rating Organization (CERO), http://www.cero.gr.jp/

  12. Media Development Authority (MDA), http://www.mda.gov.sg/Industry/Video/Guidelines/Pages/VGClassificationGuidelines.aspx

  13. Unterhaltungssoftware Selskontrolle (USK), Germany, http://www.usk.de/en/classification/

  14. Game Rating Board (GRB), South Korea, http://www.grb.or.kr/english/default.html

  15. Russia Federal Law, Article 12 (July 28, 2012), http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=133372;from=108808-0;div=LAW;rnd=0.05636497470550239

  16. Departamento de Justiça, Classificação, Títulos e Qualificação(Department of Justice, Rating, Titles and Qualification) (DEJUS), Brazil, http://portal.mj.gov.br/classificacao/data/Pages/MJ6BC270E8PTBRNN.htm

  17. Chalk, A.: Inappropriate Content: A Brief History of Videogame Ratings and the ERSB, The Escapist Magazine (July 20, 2007), http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/the-needles/1300-Inappropriate-Content-A-Brief-History-of-Videogame-Ratings-and-the-ESRB

  18. Gentile, D.A.: The rating systems for media products. In: Calvert, S., Wilson, B. (eds.) Handbook of Children, Media, and Development, pp. 527–551. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentile, D.A., Maier, J.A., Hasson, M.R., Lopez de Bonetti, B.: Parents’ Evaulation of Media Ratings a Decade After the Television Rating Were Introduced. Pediatrics (2011), doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3026

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson, K.M., Tepichin, K., Haninger, K.: Content and Ratings of Mature-Rated Video Games. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 160(4), 402–410 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson, K.M., Haninger, K.: Violence in E-Rated Video Games. JAMA 286(5), 591–598 (2001), doi:10.1001/jama.286.5.591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bijvank, M.N., Konijn, E.A., Bushman, B.J., Roelofsma, P.H.M.P.: Age and Violent-Content Labels Make Video Games Forbidden Fruits for Youth. Pediatrics 123, 870 (2009), doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cantor, J.: Ratings for Program Content: The Role of Research Findings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 557(1), 54–69 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Food and drug administration (FDA), http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/default.htm (accessed April 2012)

  25. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Medical devices, http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/PMAApprovals/default.htm

  26. Mackenzie, J.H.: Regulation in the Medical Devices Industry in the US and Europe. Business Briefing: Medical device Manufacturing and Technology (2004), http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/954/qualimedd_techEDITED.pdf (accessed April 2013)

  27. Hills, B.J.: The EU Medical Devices Approval Process: Device Classification and the Technical File (2011), http://www.gatewayfda.com/medical-devices/the-eu-medical-devices-approval-process-device-classification-and-the-technical-file/ (accessed April 2013)

  28. European Medicines Agency (EMA), http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/home/Home_Page.jsp&mid (accessed April 2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marston, H.R., Smith, S.T. (2013). Understanding the Digital Game Classification System: A Review of the Current Classification System and Its Implications for Use within Games for Health. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds) Human Factors in Computing and Informatics. SouthCHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39061-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39062-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics