Skip to main content

A Case Study on the Application of Probabilistic Conditional Modelling and Reasoning to Clinical Patient Data in Neurosurgery

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2013)

Abstract

We present a case-study of applying probabilistic logic to the analysis of clinical patient data in neurosurgery. Probabilistic conditionals are used to build a knowledge base for modelling and representing clinical brain tumor data and expert knowledge of physicians working in this area. The semantics of a knowledge base consisting of probabilistic conditionals is defined by employing the principle of maximum entropy that chooses among those probability distributions satisfying all conditionals the one that is as unbiased as possible. For computing the maximum entropy distribution we use the MEcore system that additionally provides a series of knowledge management operations like revising, updating and querying a knowledge base. The use of the obtained knowledge base is illustrated by using MEcore’s knowledge management operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, P.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G.: A conceptual agent model based on a uniform approach to various belief operations. In: Mertsching, B., Hund, M., Aziz, Z. (eds.) KI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5803, pp. 273–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruch, H.P., Trentz, O.: Berchthold Chirurgie, 6. Auflage. Elsevier GmbH (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Csiszár, I.: I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Ann. Prob. 3, 146–158 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Darwiche, A., Pearl, J.: On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Focusing vs. belief revision: A fundamental distinction when dealing with generic knowledge. In: Nonnengart, A., Kruse, R., Ohlbach, H.J., Gabbay, D.M. (eds.) FAPR 1997 and ECSQARU 1997. LNCS, vol. 1244. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Finthammer, M., Beierle, C., Berger, B., Kern-Isberner, G.: Probabilistic reasoning at optimum entropy with the MEcore system. In: Lane, H.C., Guesgen, H.W. (eds.) Proc. FLAIRS 2009. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hosten, N., Liebig, T.: Computertomografie von Kopf und Wirbelsäule. Georg Thieme Verlag (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In: Proceedings Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 1991, pp. 387–394. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kern-Isberner, G.: Characterizing the principle of minimum cross-entropy within a conditional-logical framework. Artificial Intelligence 98, 169–208 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kern-Isberner, G.: Conditionals in nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kern-Isberner, G.: Linking iterated belief change operations to nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Brewka, G., Lang, J. (eds.) Proceedings 11th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2008, pp. 166–176. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Louis, D.N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O.D., Cavenee, W.K., Burger, P.C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B.W., Kleihues, P.: The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathologica 114(2), 97–109 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, M.: Chirurgie für Studium und Praxis, 9. Auflage. Medizinische Verlags-und Informationsdienste (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paris, J.B., Vencovska, A.: In defence of the maximum entropy inference process. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 17(1), 77–103 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Park, B.J., Kim, H.K., Sade, B., Lee, J.H.: Epidemiology. In: Lee, J.H. (ed.) Meningiomas: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome, p. 11. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rödder, W., Reucher, E., Kulmann, F.: Features of the expert-system-shell SPIRIT. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(3), 483–500 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shore, J.E.: Relative entropy, probabilistic inference and AI. In: Kanal, L.N., Lemmer, J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 211–215. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steiger, H.-J., Reulen, H.J.: Manual Neurochirurgie. Ecomed Medizin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Varghese, J.: Using probabilistic logic for the analyis and evaluation of clinical patient data in neurosurgery. B.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Hagen (2012) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varghese, J., Beierle, C., Potyka, N., Kern-Isberner, G.: Using probabilistic logic and the principle of maximum entropy for the analysis of clinical brain tumor data. In: Proc. CBMS 2013. IEEE Press, New York (to appear 2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beierle, C., Finthammer, M., Potyka, N., Varghese, J., Kern-Isberner, G. (2013). A Case Study on the Application of Probabilistic Conditional Modelling and Reasoning to Clinical Patient Data in Neurosurgery. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39090-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39091-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics